Sign of Wavenumber: Electromagnetic Material

  • Thread starter Thread starter daudaudaudau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sign wavenumber
AI Thread Summary
In electromagnetics, the wavenumber k is defined as k^2 = ω^2εμ, leading to k = ±ω√(εμ). This formulation raises the question of whether ω can be negative, which some participants suggest is plausible. A negative wavenumber indicates a wave traveling in the opposite direction, which is consistent with the behavior of waves as they expand spherically from a source. The discussion highlights the complexity of wave propagation in linear, isotropic, and homogeneous materials. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing electromagnetic wave behavior.
daudaudaudau
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Hi.

In electromagnetics, a material(linear,isotropic,homogenous) with constitutive parameters \epsilon and \mu has the wavenumber k^2=\omega^2\epsilon\mu. Consequently k=\pm\omega\sqrt{\epsilon\mu}. Does this mean that \omega can actually be negative, and if so, when is it the case? It seems strange to me, but some guy told me today that a negative wavenumber was indeed possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daudaudaudau said:
Hi.

In electromagnetics, a material(linear,isotropic,homogenous) with constitutive parameters \epsilon and \mu has the wavenumber k^2=\omega^2\epsilon\mu. Consequently k=\pm\omega\sqrt{\epsilon\mu}. Does this mean that \omega can actually be negative, and if so, when is it the case? It seems strange to me, but some guy told me today that a negative wavenumber was indeed possible.

k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}

Negative k accounts for the opposite direction. As a wave approaches you, it is also moving away at the same rate (expanding spherically about the source).

Regards,

Bill
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top