Signicance of positive and negative frequencies?

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Reading some QFT in which we are faced with inhomogeneous equation

(\partial^\mu \partial_\mu + m^2)\phi(x)=J(x)

The solution is given as

\phi(x)=\phi^{(+)}_{in}(x)+\phi^{(-)}_{out}(x)+i\int{d^4 x\Delta(x-x')J(x')

where \Delta is the appropriate Green's function. "in" means the solution for early times (when J vanishes) and "out" for late times (when J vanishes). The text states "where the superscripts (+) and (-) indicate the positive- and negative-frequency parts, respectively."

I don't understand why the in- and out-solutions are restricted to the positive- and negative-frequency parts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump. I'm still interested in this. Maybe someone is around now who can look at it.

Just one little bump. Any insight is appreciated.
 
The formula is inconsistent with the text. phi plus can't be the solution at early times, because the formula also inlcudes phi minus.

My recommendation: find a better QFT text.
 
Ok. Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top