Significant Figures: Do Instructors Require Them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elbobo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In physics, the emphasis on significant figures varies among instructors, with some prioritizing the process of problem-solving over strict adherence to sigfig rules. While some educators may downplay their importance, others highlight their relevance in experimental physics, where precision and accuracy matter. Textbooks often include significant figures, suggesting they are still a valuable skill to master. The discussion indicates a need for students to adapt to different expectations based on the subject matter. Understanding significant figures remains essential for accurately conveying measurement precision in scientific contexts.
Elbobo
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
There isn't really a problem, but I just had a question about sigfigs. My current Physics teacher tells my class that in physics significant figures aren't that important like in chemistry, so we ignore them in our problems and just round to the nearest hundredth.

Do you instructors require significant figures for your students? My textbook uses them, so I have a feeling I should get used to them again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably what they meant was that physics lessons are concerned with how you get the answer not the details of the measuremnt.
In experimental physics - precision, accuracy, experimental error and sig figures are important.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
279
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top