Significant Figures for Determining Block Measurements

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Volume
AI Thread Summary
Significant figures are determined by the precision of the measuring tool used, in this case, a meter stick. The smallest division on the meter stick dictates the number of significant figures for measurements. For the block's dimensions, the length (10.6 cm), width (3.7 cm), and thickness (1.2 cm) can be reported with three significant figures, while the volume (47.064 cm³) should be rounded to three significant figures as well. The least accurate measurement sets the standard for the overall precision of the calculated results. Understanding the limitations of your measuring tools is crucial for accurate reporting in physics lab reports.
Jeng
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
im doing my physics lab report[ first one]
and the last question asks

'using a meter stick, to how many significant figures could you determine the length of the block?___________ The width of the block?__________The thickness of the block?__________The volume of the block?____________


block's...
length=10.6
width=3.7
thickness=1.2
volume=47.064
all in cm.

my teacher never taught us sig figs, and said we have to figure it out, none of us know and he won't help, so if you could help me, like where to start and how to figure it out.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well significant figures can only go up to the least accurate number
ex. 10.6 + 10.333 + 1.899999999 would equal 22.833 but since the least acurate one is 10.6 you would have to put 22.8 Try to think of how many significant figures a meter stick has and then make your answers that small.
 
What is the smallest division on your meter stick? What part of that smallest division do you think you can distinguish using your calibrated eyeballs?
Any answer will be no more accurate than the least accurate factor that goes into it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top