Simple 2D collision formula developments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the new speeds and angles of two identical balls colliding elastically. The original poster seeks assistance in deriving a formula for the post-collision velocities and angles, as they are struggling with the concepts involved. A suggestion is made to use the center of mass frame to simplify the calculations before transforming back to the original frame. The poster expresses a desire for a straightforward formula rather than a detailed explanation of the underlying physics. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenge of applying theoretical concepts to practical programming needs in collision physics.
AdamAlon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
I am currently working on a small computer programming project, and was wondering if you could give me hand.

Say I have two simple, identical balls moving in different speeds and angles towards each other. They hit each other elastically, and weigh exactly the same.
The location of their centers is also a given (see diagram for further explanation).

http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/1108/question.png

All the data is according to the diagram (which is completely general).
Can I tell through some sort of formula developments what their new speeds (size+angle) will be, after they collide? (As in U1=?, U2=?, newA1=?, newA2=?)

I tried figuring it out myself but got mixed-up and lost. Hopefully you might be able to help me :-)

Thanks a lot,

Adam
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh sure. I actually had to do this myself for a computer game we made for a class project. I don't know the equations but you can get a simple closed form expression for it. I'm sure if you do enough searching on the web or through textbooks you will find out what it is. Of course in the end you could always derive it.
 
Born2bwire said:
Oh sure. I actually had to do this myself for a computer game we made for a class project. I don't know the equations but you can get a simple closed form expression for it. I'm sure if you do enough searching on the web or through textbooks you will find out what it is. Of course in the end you could always derive it.

Yeah, I figured it was rather simple, but I can't seem to find anything of that sort anywhere.
A closed form expression would be fantastic, but I am having a hard time deriving it myself. Thus, I turned to you guys for assistance :)
So, can any of you give me a hand?
 
Transform to the center of mass frame in which the total momentum is zero. Forget about the angles and velocities in the original frame for the moment. Just work out the most general case of a collision as seen in the center of mass frame (which is very simple).

Then transform this to a frame in which the initial velocities are arbitrary. You need to do a little algebra to find the angles in that other frame.
 
Count Iblis said:
Transform to the center of mass frame in which the total momentum is zero. Forget about the angles and velocities in the original frame for the moment. Just work out the most general case of a collision as seen in the center of mass frame (which is very simple).

Then transform this to a frame in which the initial velocities are arbitrary. You need to do a little algebra to find the angles in that other frame.

Sorry, I sort of lost you. I am yet to have studied momentum, and I tried to understand momentum from guides I have read.
Could you just give me a finished formula? I do not necessarily need to thoroughly understand the way...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top