Simple Accelerometer Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Helicase
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerometer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the fundamental principles of accelerometers and their relation to kinematics. Accelerometers measure acceleration across different axes, and the data can be graphed to derive speed and displacement. A common model for understanding accelerometers is a mass suspended by a spring, where the spring's elongation indicates changes in acceleration. When the system accelerates upward, the mass moves downward, reflecting increased force due to both gravity and acceleration. For further details, the reference suggests consulting "Resnick and Halliday Physics Vol 1" for a deeper understanding of these concepts.
Helicase
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Greeting fellow science enthusiasts,

I just started learning physics so please excuse my primitive knowledge. I'm supposed to discuss a technology that applies concepts related to kinematics and I'd like to discuss accelerometers. Could you please explain the basic equations for motion in an accelerometer or direct me to a helpful resource?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
All you need is the definition of acceleration. Helps if you know about graphs.

The accelerometer gives you a series of numbers which are the accelerations for each axis it keeps track of.
You graph them ... the area under the graph gives you the speed-time data, and the area under a graph of the speed-time data gives you the displacement-time data.
 
Last edited:
That is quite helpful. Thank you!
 
It is likely the most useful model for an accelerometer is a box with a mass suspended from the ceiling by a spring. When the box is not accelerating, the tension responsible for elongating (i.e. lengthening) the spring is equal to the force of gravity. A scale (ruler) along side the spring will record this (reference) length.
If the box accelerates (increases it's speed) upward, the mass moves downward, just like when you are in an elevator and it starts moving upward, you feel heavier. The downward motion of the mass indicates the force on the mass has increased. (A better way to say this is the spring has to provide a force that overcomes gravity and in addition it has to supply an additional force due to the acceleration of the elevator. Just like the scale would record your heavier weight when you ride in the elevator when it starts upward) The difference in length (current length - reference length) times the spring constant (k); divided my the mass is the acceleration of the box.

This describes the general idea for one-axis and this is oversimplified. If you need more detail I can provide it but this are the general idea.

To some extent, the other axes are simpler because gravity does not stretch the spring initially. The "reference" length is equal to the length of the un-stretched spring. I will check Resnick and Halliday Physics Vol 1. I think I remember learning this there.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top