Simple Alpha Particle Spectroscopy Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the principles of alpha particle detection using a spectrometer, specifically focusing on the importance of creating a vacuum in the detection chamber and the positioning of the radioactive source relative to the detector.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the reasoning behind evacuating the chamber to eliminate air particles that could absorb alpha particles. Questions arise regarding the optimal positioning of the radioactive source in relation to the detector, with comparisons made to the effectiveness of being under an umbrella during rain.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions about radiation emission and interference, with some suggesting that positioning the source beneath the detector may reduce background radiation interference. There is an ongoing exploration of these concepts without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential interference from background radiation and the necessity of a vacuum, indicating constraints in the experimental setup that may affect detection accuracy.

~Sam~
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When detecting alpha decay with a spectrometer, why is it important to evacuate the chamber to create a adequate vacuum for where the source is place? Why is it better to place a radioactive source underneath a detector facing up rather than above the detector and facing down?


Homework Equations


None.


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm guessing the pump will evacuate any particles in the air that would absorbed the alpha particles. For the second part, I'm not so sure because radiation emits out evenly, so how would it make a difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When it rains, why is it better to be under the umbrella than on on top of it?
 
gneill said:
When it rains, why is it better to be under the umbrella than on on top of it?

Well because rain is approaching from the top, and being under it prevents rain from hitting the person. Not sure I quite understand the comparison here. It sounds like you're saying something along the lines that it is ideal for the source to be under the detector because then the detector covers it. But I'm not sure how that explains it. Since radioactive sources radiates outwards in even directions, how would this affect it? Unless you mean to say that it prevents interference from the environment.
 
~Sam~ said:
Since radioactive sources radiates outwards in even directions, how would this affect it? Unless you mean to say that it prevents interference from the environment.

Bingo. What's the biggest source of interference? What's the biggest "umbrella" you can think of? (consider that the counter is "looking" directionally).
 
gneill said:
Bingo. What's the biggest source of interference? What's the biggest "umbrella" you can think of? (consider that the counter is "looking" directionally).

ahhh, other than excess particles in the air due to imperfect vacuum, it must be background radiation? The detector is placed so it looks down towards the emitting source, preventing interference from background radiation coming from above to enter the detector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K