Simple Alpha Particle Spectroscopy Question

AI Thread Summary
Creating an adequate vacuum in the chamber is crucial for detecting alpha decay because it eliminates air particles that could absorb the alpha particles, enhancing detection accuracy. Placing the radioactive source underneath the detector allows the detector to face directly towards the source, minimizing interference from background radiation that may come from above. This positioning ensures that the detector captures more emitted alpha particles while reducing the impact of environmental noise. The discussion highlights the importance of both vacuum conditions and optimal source positioning in alpha particle spectroscopy. Understanding these factors is essential for accurate measurements in radiation detection.
~Sam~
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When detecting alpha decay with a spectrometer, why is it important to evacuate the chamber to create a adequate vacuum for where the source is place? Why is it better to place a radioactive source underneath a detector facing up rather than above the detector and facing down?


Homework Equations


None.


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm guessing the pump will evacuate any particles in the air that would absorbed the alpha particles. For the second part, I'm not so sure because radiation emits out evenly, so how would it make a difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When it rains, why is it better to be under the umbrella than on on top of it?
 
gneill said:
When it rains, why is it better to be under the umbrella than on on top of it?

Well because rain is approaching from the top, and being under it prevents rain from hitting the person. Not sure I quite understand the comparison here. It sounds like you're saying something along the lines that it is ideal for the source to be under the detector because then the detector covers it. But I'm not sure how that explains it. Since radioactive sources radiates outwards in even directions, how would this affect it? Unless you mean to say that it prevents interference from the environment.
 
~Sam~ said:
Since radioactive sources radiates outwards in even directions, how would this affect it? Unless you mean to say that it prevents interference from the environment.

Bingo. What's the biggest source of interference? What's the biggest "umbrella" you can think of? (consider that the counter is "looking" directionally).
 
gneill said:
Bingo. What's the biggest source of interference? What's the biggest "umbrella" you can think of? (consider that the counter is "looking" directionally).

ahhh, other than excess particles in the air due to imperfect vacuum, it must be background radiation? The detector is placed so it looks down towards the emitting source, preventing interference from background radiation coming from above to enter the detector.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top