Simple Alpha Particle Spectroscopy Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the importance of creating a vacuum in alpha particle spectroscopy to minimize interference from air particles and background radiation. It is established that evacuating the chamber enhances the detection of alpha decay by eliminating air molecules that could absorb alpha particles. Additionally, positioning the radioactive source beneath the detector is advantageous as it allows the detector to shield itself from background radiation that may originate from above, thereby improving measurement accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of alpha particle spectroscopy
  • Knowledge of vacuum systems and their role in particle detection
  • Familiarity with background radiation concepts
  • Basic principles of radiation emission
NEXT STEPS
  • Research vacuum technology in particle detection systems
  • Explore the effects of background radiation on alpha particle measurements
  • Study the design and function of alpha particle detectors
  • Learn about shielding techniques in radiation detection
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, radiation safety officers, and researchers involved in particle detection and spectroscopy.

~Sam~
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When detecting alpha decay with a spectrometer, why is it important to evacuate the chamber to create a adequate vacuum for where the source is place? Why is it better to place a radioactive source underneath a detector facing up rather than above the detector and facing down?


Homework Equations


None.


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm guessing the pump will evacuate any particles in the air that would absorbed the alpha particles. For the second part, I'm not so sure because radiation emits out evenly, so how would it make a difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When it rains, why is it better to be under the umbrella than on on top of it?
 
gneill said:
When it rains, why is it better to be under the umbrella than on on top of it?

Well because rain is approaching from the top, and being under it prevents rain from hitting the person. Not sure I quite understand the comparison here. It sounds like you're saying something along the lines that it is ideal for the source to be under the detector because then the detector covers it. But I'm not sure how that explains it. Since radioactive sources radiates outwards in even directions, how would this affect it? Unless you mean to say that it prevents interference from the environment.
 
~Sam~ said:
Since radioactive sources radiates outwards in even directions, how would this affect it? Unless you mean to say that it prevents interference from the environment.

Bingo. What's the biggest source of interference? What's the biggest "umbrella" you can think of? (consider that the counter is "looking" directionally).
 
gneill said:
Bingo. What's the biggest source of interference? What's the biggest "umbrella" you can think of? (consider that the counter is "looking" directionally).

ahhh, other than excess particles in the air due to imperfect vacuum, it must be background radiation? The detector is placed so it looks down towards the emitting source, preventing interference from background radiation coming from above to enter the detector.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K