Mathematica Simple but complete mathematical methods book?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on recommendations for a mathematical methods book tailored for undergraduate physics students. Boas is highlighted as a solid choice, though its completeness is questioned, particularly regarding topics like group theory. Morse and Feshbach are mentioned as another option, with the suggestion that a comprehensive book should cover a broad range of topics without delving too deeply into advanced mathematics. Riley, Hobson, and Bence are recommended for their extensive coverage suitable for a four-year degree, including relevant aspects of Hilbert spaces. The conversation notes that Boas is more accessible but may lack depth in certain areas, while Arfken is suggested for more advanced topics, indicating that a combination of these texts might provide a well-rounded mathematical foundation for physics students.
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
Can anyone recommand a simple but complete mathematical methods book written especially for undergrad physics students?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Arfkin isn't too bad at the advanced UG/Grad level.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pivoxa15 said:
Complete as in complete for undergrads.
I knew that. But undergrads in different schools around the world may be exposed to a little more or a little less of the "average curriculum". By now you may know that Boas does not cover group theory, for example.

Another book that I have heard about, but never read, is by Morse and Feshbach.
 
So a complete one would include group theory. I like to be on the safe side. However the depth of the maths shouldn't be too deep. So wide scope but not deep.
 
Take a look at Riley, Hobson, Bence - Mathematical Methods

I'd say this has pretty much everything you'll cover in a 4 year degree.
Boas would also suit, but i'd say it's a bit more cookbookish than the likes of R, H, B... Arfken is smashin' but better used in conjunction with a more elaborate book.. well i find that at the early years of my undergrad degree
 
I've had a look at Boas and was impressed. Its nice layout and font complements it even more. However for higher stuff like hilbert spaces, one will need Arfken. Does R,H,B have stuff on hilbert spaces? I think not. Maybe a combintation of Boas and Arfken would form a complete mathematical book I am after. Although it does have Representation theory and group theory.
 
pivoxa15 said:
Does R,H,B have stuff on hilbert spaces?
Chapter 17, "Eigenfunction methods for differential equations," covers the aspects of Hilbert spaces that are relevant to undergrad physics. I personally haven't used Riley, Hobson & Bence all that much, but I think that is because American universities tend to favor textbooks written by American authors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Back
Top