Simple Capacitor System Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoranPrease
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor System
AI Thread Summary
To compress a capacitor system, one can start by identifying and combining recognizable elements, such as merging capacitors 2 and 3 into a single unit. This results in a simplified representation that can be further compressed by combining additional elements, like capacitors 4 and 5. The goal is to reduce the system to a single effective capacitor through successive simplifications. It is important to avoid using "+" signs in the final representation, as they can be misleading. Ultimately, this method allows for a clearer and more efficient understanding of the capacitor system.
NoranPrease
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How does one go about 'compressing' a capacitor system?

Code:
                  -------| 1 |--------| 2 |----------| 3 |------------------------
                                 |                                       |
                                 |                                       |
                                 |----| 4 |-----------| 5 |--------------|
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can "draw" like that with [noparse]
Code:
[/noparse]-tags:
[code]
                   -------| 1 |--------| 2 |----------| 3 |--------------
                                 |                                       |
                                 |                                       |
                                 |----| 4 |-----------| 5 |--------------|
Start with elements you recognize? You can combine 2 and 3, for example.
 
So it would 'compress' into something like
Code:
                  -------| 1 |------------| 2+3 |---------------------
                                 |                            |
                                 |                            |
                                 |--------| 4+5 |-------------|
 
I would not use "+" signs there, but it is the right approach. This allows another simplification now, and afterwards you can do a third and get a single effective capacitor.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top