Simple Centripetal Force Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the effects of tripling the radius on centripetal force and acceleration using different formulas. Two key formulas are mentioned: F_c = mv^2/r and F_c = m(4πr^2)/T^2. The answers vary based on whether speed or angular speed is held constant, leading to different conclusions about centripetal force. Clarification is sought on the context of the problem, as it significantly influences the outcome. Understanding the relationship between centripetal force, radius, and speed is essential for resolving the confusion.
chrisdapos
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hello, I know that there are two possible formulas to solve for radius. You can use (mv^2)/r ,or, (m4pir^2)/T^2. Now, the question is asking when the radius is trippled, the Centripital force is...?

Using the first equation, I come out with 1/3. Using the second equation, I come out with 9.

That confuses me enough, but when I looked back on a quiz we had (sometimes I get solutions from quizs), I found that my teacher asked when radius is tripled, centripital acceleration is...? The answer was 3. Can anyone provide some insight into what I am doing wrong and what equation i should use to get my answer. Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chrisdapos said:
Hello, I know that there are two possible formulas to solve for radius. You can use (mv^2)/r ,or, (m4pir^2)/T^2. Now, the question is asking when the radius is trippled, the Centripital force is...?
First off, there's another useful formula for centripetal force, which I show below. Realize that they are all equivalent; the only thing that changes are is variable of choice: linear speed, angular speed, period.

There's really not enough information given to give a sensible answer. It depends on what is being held constant. Can you give the exact question including any relevant context?

For example: If the problem stated something like "A car races on a circular track. If the speed stays the same, what happens to the centripetal force if the radius triples?" In that case, the relevant formula is the one containing v & r (F_c = m v^2 /r) and the answer is 1/3.

But what if it said "If the angular speed stays the same, what happens to the centripetal force if the radius triples?" In that case, the relevant formula is the one containing \omega & r (F_c = m \omega^2 r) and the answer is that the force triples.
 
Last edited:
The question reads exactly, if the radius were tripled, what would happen to the centripital force? The preceeding question is describe the relationship between Centripetal Force and: v, v^2, T and M. I don't think the preceeding question holds any context though. Thank you for your help!
 
Doc Al said:
First off, there's another useful formula for centripetal acceleration, which I show below. Realize that they are all equivalent; the only thing that changes are is variable of choice: linear speed, angular speed, period.

There's really not enough information given to give a sensible answer. It depends on what is being held constant. Can you give the exact question including any relevant context?

For example: If the problem stated something like "A car races on a circular track. If the speed stays the same, what happens to the centripetal force if the radius triples?" In that case, the relevant formula is the one containing v & r (a_c = m v^2 /r) and the answer is 1/3.

But what if it said "If the angular speed stays the same, what happens to the centripetal force if the radius triples?" In that case, the relevant formula is the one containing \omega & r (a_c = m \omega^2 r) and the answer is that the force triples.

isn't a_c = \frac{v^2}{r} and F = \frac{mv^2}{r}?
 
andrewchang said:
isn't a_c = \frac{v^2}{r} and F = \frac{mv^2}{r}?
Of course. Oops! :redface: I'll fix my post. (Thanks.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top