Simple Collisions Question Solution | Conservation of Momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasnain721
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a simple collision problem involving conservation of momentum and gravitational potential energy. The initial calculations show that gravitational potential energy equals kinetic energy, yielding a height of 0.815 meters. Momentum conservation is emphasized, with the momentum before and after the collision calculated to be equal. A correction is noted regarding the mass used in momentum calculations, clarifying that it should be (80/1000) kg instead of (80/100). The final answer for part c is confirmed as 2.67 seconds, indicating the solution is correct.
hasnain721
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] simple collisions question

Homework Statement



http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/1253/28157442gm4.jpg


Homework Equations



√(2gh)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)


Gravitational potential energy = kinetic energy

this gives u

√(2gh)

= 0.815 metres


b)
i)
In a closed system, total momentum is always conserved.

ii)

Momentum before = momentum after


momentum before :
mass X velocity
(80/100) kg X 4 m/s = 0.32kgm/s

momentum after :
mass X velocity
((80/100) X 3) kg X x = 0.32 kgm/s

therefore x = 1.33 m/s

Is that rite?


and for c) :

ah i get it now!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
All is fine up to the momentum calculations where you use (80/100) as the mass. This should be (80/1000) or (8/100). You seem to have the right value for the momentum though so that's probably just a typo. What did you get for part c?

EDIT: Just noticed you've solved it.
 
Kurdt said:
All is fine up to the momentum calculations where you use (80/100) as the mass. This should be (80/1000) or (8/100). What did you get for part c?

oh yes srry! for part c i got : 2.67 seconds is tht rite?
 
hasnain721 said:
oh yes srry! for part c i got : 2.67 seconds is tht rite?

Looks fine to me.
 
Kurdt said:
Looks fine to me.

cheers!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top