Simple Conversion Problem: 6 Pounds in 30 Days to Milligrams/Second

  • Thread starter Thread starter pepsi_in_a_can
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To convert a weight loss of 6 pounds over 30 days into milligrams per second, the correct calculations involve converting pounds to milligrams and days to seconds. One pound equals approximately 453,592.37 milligrams, and 30 days equals 2,592,000 seconds. The formula for the conversion is 6 pounds multiplied by 453,592.37 mg, divided by 2,592,000 seconds, resulting in a loss rate of nearly 1 milligram per second. The initial miscalculation likely stemmed from incorrect conversion factors or not accounting for the total time in seconds correctly. The final answer is approximately 1 mg/s, confirming the need for precise unit conversions in such calculations.
pepsi_in_a_can
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For some reason I'm having trouble doing a simple conversion problem:


A person on a diet loses 6 pound(s) every 30 days. What is the loss rate in milligrams per second?

I get 62.9989, but apparently that answer is wrong, but I'm not sure why. I may have to put it in scientific notation, but I'm not sure what I'm overlooking. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1 pound = x kg
1 kg = y mg
-> 1 pound = xy mg

1 day = p hours
1 hour = q seconds
-> 1 day = pq seconds

pound/day : mg/s
-> 1/1 : xy/pq

you don't have 1 pound/day but 6/30. Each 1 pound per day is worth xy/pq mg/s, and you have 6/30 of them.
 
There are 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, so 60*60= 3600 seconds in an hour. There are 24 hours in a do so (24)(3600)= 86400 seconds in a day and so 30(86400)= 2592000 seconds in 30 days.

"pounds to milligrams" is a little harder since they are in differents systems so there are not an integer number of grams in a pound. According to http://www.onlineconversion.com/weight_common.htm, there are 453.2923 grams in a pound and so 453292 milligrams in a pound. 6 pounds in 30 days is 6(453291 milligrams)/ 2592000 seconds which is very nearly 1 milligram per second.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top