Simple energy question with rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter oreosama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Rotation
AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum height h for a solid sphere rolling down a hill and remaining on track through a loop, the energy conservation equation is applied. The equation mgh = mg2R + 1/2 Iω^2 leads to the conclusion that h must equal 11/5 R. At the top of the loop, the normal force is zero, and the centripetal force equation m*v^2/R = mg indicates that v^2 = gR. It is emphasized that the height must account for both translational and rotational kinetic energy, suggesting that the initial height must be higher than that required for a block sliding without friction. The discussion confirms the calculations and stresses the importance of considering all forms of kinetic energy at the loop's peak.
oreosama
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a small solid sphere of mass m and radius r starts from rest and rolls down a hill without slipping. the sphere encounters a loop of radius R where R >> r.

Given R determine the min height h such that the ball remains on the track throughout the loop


Homework Equations



I = 2/5 mR^2

ω = v/r

The Attempt at a Solution



highest point requiring most energy is at top of loop:

mgh = mg2R + 1/2 Iω^2

mgh = mg2R + 1/2 * 2/5 m r^2 *v^2/r^2

gh = 2Rg + 1/5*v^2



at top of loop, normal force is 0,

Fy = N + mg
ma = mg

m*v^2/R = mg
v^2 = gR


...

gh = 2Rg + 1/5 Rg

h = 11/5 R

this is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To check your results - it is useful to compare to something:

i.e. If this were a block sliding around the track without friction, then what would the minimum h have to be?
(for the ball, some energy is stored in rotation - so you need to start higher than this.)

How fast is the ball rolling at the top of the hoop?
(i.e. is the kinetic energy a lot or a little more than the potential energy there? says if you should start a little higher or a lot higher.)
 
oreosama said:
mgh = mg2R + 1/2 Iω^2

Have you included all of the kinetic energy at the top?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top