Simple harmonic motion and specific gravity. PLEASE HELP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that a weighted cylinder submerged in wine exhibits simple harmonic motion (SHM) to determine the wine's specific gravity. The restoring force acting on the cylinder is shown to be proportional to its displacement from the equilibrium position, confirming SHM. Simplifications are allowed, assuming the wine's surface level remains constant during the cylinder's motion. The net force on the cylinder is derived from the difference between its weight and the weight of the displaced wine. The oscillation frequency and period of the cylinder's motion are also discussed, linking them to the specific gravity of the wine.
hbanana
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
simple harmonic motion and specific gravity. PLEASE HELP!

The problem I need help with is this: In his lecture, Dr. Dyson argued that one could determine the specific gravity of a wine in the absence of a hydrometer. To demonstrate this he constructed a 100g weighted cylinder of Length (L) and cross-sectional area (A) that floated vertically. When the cylinder was placed in a glass of wine a length (L') was submerged at its equilibrium postion. He lifted the cylinder from its equilibrium position by an amount y, released it and timed its cycles. a) show that the cylinder executes simple harmonic motion when it is released. That is show the restoring force is proportional to the cylinder's displacement from its equilibrium position.
I was able to complete the following:
FB=p(V1 + V2)g
(p=density not pressure)

V2=Ay
(y=displacement)

FB=pV1g + pAyg.

I know i have to some how prove that the Force is proportional to displacement, but I'm stuck at exactly how to prove that.
This problem actually has more parts, but I can't go onto the next parts until I prove this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Question

Are you allowed to simplify things by assuming that the level of the wine's surface (with respect to the glass) does not fall and rise as the cylinder bobs up and down? I.e. that the cylinder's diameter is small compared to the glass's diameter, and the cylinder's amplitude of vertical motion is not too great. (If not, then it seems to me you have to calculate the dynamics of both the cylinder and the liquid.)

Also, is your density parameter the density of the cylinder or of the wine?
 
Last edited:
yes, we are allowed to simplify. I think my professor just wants us to prove that the specific gravity of the wine can be determined by the displacement of the cylinder. the density in my equation is the density of the fluid.

Thanks!
 
As you have already stated, motion will be simple harmonic if the restoring force is proportional to distance from equilibrium position. Symbolically,

F = -k(y-y_0)

where I have followed your lead and chosen y as my position variable, and y_0 as position at equilibrium.

In the particular case that you are dealing with, the net force on the cylinder is the difference between its weight and the weight of the wine it displaces at any given time. That is:

F = (L'-y)Apg - W

where F and y are taken as positive in the upward direction, L', cylinder cross section area A and liquid density p are as you have defined them, g is acceleration of gravity, and W is the constant weight of the cylinder (100 g times the acceleration of gravity).

I can re-write my equation as

F = -Apg{y-[L'-W/(Apg)]}

which is in the form of the first equation, with k=Apg and y_0=L'-W/(Apg).

That takes care of the first part of your question.
 
Last edited:
thank you so much!
 
No problem, except...

I left out some g's, which I have edited into my post above. Hope this isn't too late!

The oscillating frequency (in radians per unit time, I believe) is the square root of Apg/m where m is the mass of the cylinder. So the cycle frequency is 1/(2pi) times that radian frequency. The period of oscillation is the reciprocal of the cycle frequency.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top