Simple Harmonic Motion of a particle of mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a particle of mass constrained to move along the x-axis with a potential energy defined by V(x) = a + bx + cx². It is established that for the particle to exhibit simple harmonic motion (SHM), the acceleration must be proportional to -x, which leads to the conclusion that the effective spring constant k equals 2c/m. The participant suggests shifting the origin to the vertex of the potential energy parabola to simplify the analysis, resulting in a new coordinate system where the equilibrium point is properly defined. By rewriting the potential energy in terms of this new reference, they derive a form that aligns with the characteristics of SHM. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying the equilibrium position to analyze the motion effectively.
Himanshu
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is constrained to move along the x-axis. The potential energy is given by, V (x) = a + bx + cx2, where a, b, c are positive constants. If the particle is disturbed slightly from its equilibrium position, then it follows that

(a) it performs simple harmonic motion with period 2pi*Sqrt(m/2c)
(b) it performs simple harmonic motion with period 2pi*Sqrt(ma/2b^2).
(c) it moves with constant velocity
(d) it moves with constant acceleration


Homework Equations



Force=-Gradient of V(x)
F=-(b+2cx)
a=-(b+2cx)/m
T=2pi*Sqrt(Displacement/Acceleration)


The Attempt at a Solution



I cannot proceed further. For an object to perform SHM 'a' should be proportional to -x. But how do I find this proportionality over the sum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shm

Dimensionally b/m must be an acceleraton. So you can write a + b/m = a' = -2c/m*x. So k becomes 2c/m.
 
Last edited:
The potential energy of a SHM oscillator is given by

U = 1/2 kx^2

it therefore seems that for the given equation the origin is not situated at the equilibrium point of the oscillator. Maybe you should try and shift the reference system and see what you get.
 
andrevdh said:
The potential energy of a SHM oscillator is given by

U = 1/2 kx^2

it therefore seems that for the given equation the origin is not situated at the equilibrium point of the oscillator. Maybe you should try and shift the reference system and see what you get.



On Shifting the origin to the vertex of the parabola I get the origin as (-b/2c, (b^2-4ac)/2c^2) with reference to the previous coordinate system. Therefore the abscissa x' in the new coordinate system is (x+b/2c).

On putting this value in the PE equation I get U=1/2 kx'^2=1/2 k(x+b/2c)^2. How do I proceed from here onwards?
 
Take c common from the equation, and write
V = c(a/c + b/c*x + x^2).You can wright this as c(x + alpha)^2 where alpha = b/2c and (alpha)^2 = a^2/c^2.
Now proceed using relevant euqations.
 
My maths are a bit rusty in this respect so I did it the long and hard way. I rewrote the original equation in terms of the shifted reference system (where the origin coincides with the position of minimum potenetial energy). That is

x = x_1 - \frac{b}{2c}

that got me to

V(x_1) = a - \frac{3b^2}{4c} + cx_1^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top