Simple Moment of Inertia Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the moment of inertia (MOI) for different shapes, particularly why the MOI for a solid cylinder or disk is expressed as ΔI = (1/2)(r)^2 Δm instead of the simpler ΔI = (r)^2 Δm. This distinction arises from the integration process used to calculate MOI, where the solid shape is composed of many thin disks, each contributing to the total inertia. The factor of 1/2 is derived from the MOI of a disk about its center of mass, which is I_disk = (1/2)MR^2, as opposed to the MOI of a point mass, which is MR^2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the integration method and the geometric composition of the solid shape in determining the correct MOI. Overall, the integration of the contributions from these thin disks leads to the inclusion of the constant factor in the MOI equation.
driven4rhythm
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Here is the picture of the problem: http://yfrog.com/3uwtfup
I understand every other step except for the equation for moment of inertia. In my book the most basic equation for moment is ΔI = (r)^2 Δm but for this problem ΔI = (1/2)(r)^2 Δm. Why is that? Does it have something to do with the method of integration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you are integrating to calculate the moment of inertia (MOI), you take the MOI of a tiny mass and sum all of those to get the total. MOI of a point mass is mr^2. In this case the tiny mass is a disk. MOI of a solid cylinder, disk etc is 1/2 mr^2.
 
ahmadmz said:
When you are integrating to calculate the moment of inertia (MOI), you take the MOI of a tiny mass and sum all of those to get the total. MOI of a point mass is mr^2. In this case the tiny mass is a disk. MOI of a solid cylinder, disk etc is 1/2 mr^2.
How would you go about deriving the constant that's out front, in this case 1/2?
 
Using integration :)
There is an example or two in almost every physics text that i have seen. Check out some other books if your book doesn't have it.
 
The constant comes from the fact that a solid cone is made up of many thin disks (horizontal cross-sections of the cone wrt axis of rotation). So the rotational inertia of the solid cone is equal to the total rotational inertia of all these thin disks. The rotational inertia of a disk of radius R about its center of mass is
I_{disk} = 1/2 MR^{2}

Which is derived from the rotational inertia of a ring of radius R about its center of mass
I_{ring} = MR^{2}

Which is derived from the rotational inertia of a point mass at a radius R from the axis of rotation.
I = MR^{2}

So a small part of the rotational inertia of the cone (dI_{cone}) is equal to the rotational inertia of a thin disk of radius y, 1/2 dmy^{2}.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top