Simple photometry question with something going wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photometry
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the fraction of detected gamma rays in a photometry context. The key conclusion is that when a point source is directly in front of a detector, the effective detection area is half of the total surface area of a sphere, leading to a 50% detection rate of emitted gamma rays. Misunderstandings arise when this 50% factor is incorrectly applied multiple times in calculations, which can skew results. The correct formula for the fraction of detected gamma rays is derived from the solid angle considerations, specifically using the equation 2*pi*(d/2)^2/(4*pi*x^2) = (d/4x)^2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid angle calculations in photometry
  • Familiarity with gamma ray detection principles
  • Knowledge of basic geometry related to spheres
  • Proficiency in mathematical reasoning and formula manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study solid angle calculations in photometric systems
  • Explore gamma ray detection technologies and their efficiencies
  • Review geometric principles related to spheres and their applications in physics
  • Investigate common pitfalls in photometry calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, photometry researchers, and anyone involved in gamma ray detection and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
[EDIT] To be deleted.

[EDIT] To be deleted.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick280857 said:
[tex]\frac{1}{4\pi x^{2}}\times\pi\frac{d^2}{4}[/tex]

Therefore the fraction of detected gamma rays is 50% of this fraction

I do not think your reasoning is correct here. You correctly calculate the ratio of the detector surface compared to the total surface of a sphere with diameter x, which is the fraction of detected gamma rays. If the point source is positioned directly in front of the detector, it is a good approximation to consider the detector surface to be as large as half of the total sphere with small diameter. Therefore 50% of the gamma rays will be detected and the 50% emitted in the other direction will not be detected. If you multiply this factor 0.5 again to the ratio of detected gamma rays you calculated before, you consider this factor twice and get a wrong result - unless I misunderstood the problem and the 50% are a measure of detector efficiency, but I do not think so.
 
Thank you for replying.

The 50% controls the fraction of the solid angle over which the detector gets the flux...so its 2*pi*(d/2)^2/(4*pi*x^2) = (d/4x)^2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K