Simple Power Equations Gone Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaVinci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding power equations in electrical circuits, specifically the conventions for determining whether power is absorbed or delivered. The key formula, P=IV, leads to confusion when dealing with negative values for current and voltage. Participants clarify that the sign of power indicates absorption or delivery, with negative power suggesting a source providing energy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent reference directions for current and voltage to avoid misinterpretation. Ultimately, the consensus is that while negative power can be a useful convention for analysis, it does not exist in a physical sense.
DaVinci
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I like to think of myself as pretty smart and on the ball with the electrical stuff. But I am having trouble figuring out this one concept with power and it seems really simple. I am probably just over thinking the whole thing as usual. Hopefully someone can give me some insight.

In my Circuit Analysis (Elecrical Networks) class, we just covered power, P=IV, and all the stuff about how to figure out if an element is absorbing or delivering power. What we have been told is the following:

When current goes from + to -, Pabs = +VI and Pdel = -VI
When current goes from - to +, Pabs = -VI and Pdel = +VI

This seems pretty simple... you have 2A going into a element from + to - and the voltage on the terminals is 5V. (5)(2) = 10. Since the answer is positive, there is 10W power being absorbed.

Then we say that in the same case it is -2A. So, (-2)(5) = -10W. Here is where things start to get crazy. Current is going from + to - still... but then you can say that -2A from + to - is like 2A from - to +. This would then be correct with 10W Absorbed.

But when things really hit the fan is when we get a problem like this:

You have -2A going from + to - and the absorbed power is 6W. What is the voltage across the terminals?

Well, from P=IV we know that V=P/I. So, 6W/-2A = -3V. But if you have -2A going from + to -, then you have 2A going from - to +. So power abs needs to be -VI in this case...

I think I just confused myself again. Do you see my plight? I think I know it... it is just getting jumbled up in over thinking.

If you can answer the following questions, I would be grateful.

What is the convention to use to determine the power in an element and whether it is being absorbed or delivered?

How would you use the same convention to determine either Voltage or Current given the power and one or the other quantity listed.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You CANNOT have negative power. When you have a negative voltage you will also have a negative current.
 
There are questions in my textbooks and notes that show only one of those values as being negative, leading to a negative answer for P=IV. It is my understanding that the sign on P tells you whether or not the power is absorbed or supplied... yet the answer to that continues to escape me depending on which direction the current is in and such.
 
The + and - signs are an arbitrary reference, and so is the direction of the current. When you state that the positive reference of the current is from + to -, you have associate references. In your example of a -2 A going from + to -, what you are really saying is that your current goes in the opposite sense of your reference, so you have a +2 A going from - to + in your chosen reference. Since power is being absorbed, your voltage must be -3 V. This means that the potential in your terminal labelled - is greater than the potential labelled +.
 
For the person who said there cannot be negative power--- I like to actually use negative power when finding out what sources PROVIDE power to the circuit, and positive power for power absorbed by resistors (considering P = iiR is always positive). Just my way of using convention... but you are correct when in a physical sense there cannot be negative power.
 
Theelectricchild said:
For the person who said there cannot be negative power--- I like to actually use negative power when finding out what sources PROVIDE power to the circuit, and positive power for power absorbed by resistors (considering P = iiR is always positive). Just my way of using convention... but you are correct when in a physical sense there cannot be negative power.

I considered that but decided not to confuse the OP any farther than he already was.
 
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top