Simple problem on waves (Math query)

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a wave problem involving incident, reflected, and transmitted waves on a string, using boundary conditions for continuity and differentiability. The user struggles with integrating a key equation to express the reflected and transmitted waves in terms of the incident wave. A suggestion is made to correctly apply integration techniques, emphasizing the importance of proper variable substitution. The user realizes their mistake in factoring terms incorrectly and gains clarity on the integration process. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between wave functions and their derivatives in the context of wave mechanics.
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



(Griffiths) Suppose you send an incident wave of specified shape g_{I}(z-v_{1}t), down string number 1. It gives rise to a reflected wave, h_{R}(z+v_{1}t), and a transmitted wave, g_{T}(z-v_{2}t). By imposing the boundary conditions 9.26 and 9.27, find h_{R} and g_{T}.

(Boundary conditions 9.26 and 9.27 are equations expressing continuity and differentiability at z = 0).

Homework Equations



Continuity at z = 0 implies

g_{I}(-v_{1}t) + h_{R}(v_{1}t) = g_{T}(-v_{2}t)

Also,

\frac{\partial g_{I}}{\partial z} = -\frac{1}{v_{1}}\frac{\partial g_{I}}{\partial t}

\frac{\partial h_{R}}{\partial z} = \frac{1}{v_{1}}\frac{\partial h_{R}}{\partial t}\frac{\partial g_{T}}{\partial z} = -\frac{1}{v_{2}}\frac{\partial g_{T}}{\partial t}

So the differentiability condition

\left(\frac{\partial g_{I}}{\partial z}\right)_{z=0^{-}} + \left(\frac{\partial h_{R}}{\partial z}\right)_{z=0^{-}} = \left(\frac{\partial g_{T}}{\partial z}\right)_{z=0^{+}}

is equivalent to

-\frac{1}{v_{1}}\frac{\partial g_{I}}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{v_{1}}\frac{\partial h_{R}}{\partial t} = -\frac{1}{v_{2}}\frac{\partial g_{T}}{\partial t}

The Attempt at a Solution



I am just stuck with the integration of the last equation. I know I should get something like

g_{I}(-v_{1}t) - h_{R}(v_{1}t) = \frac{v_{1}}{v_{2}}g_{T}(-v_{2}t) + C

C = constant

But I can't exactly get to this by integrating the last equation...I get velocity squares or something (which I know from analysis of sine waves, is wrong)...I think I am wrongly applying the chain rule. Can someone please help me out here? (:zzz:)

Thanks and cheers
vivek
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas, anyone? :confused:
 
To the Moderator: Can you please shift this to the appropriate sub forum?
 
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think you need to use the chain rule. Since you have no hidden t dependence in your functions I guess you can say
<br /> \int (\frac{\partial}{\partial t} f(z,t) )dt=f(z,t) + C<br />
Differentiation and then integration with respect to t should give the same function back. Then you get directly the answer you wanted...

Using this together with the continuity at z=0 should allow you to express transmitted and reflected waves in terms of the incident wave.
 
Hi Andrew

Thanks for your reply. Sorry, I meant to say "change of variable" instead of "chain rule". This is where I am getting stuck:

-\frac{1}{v_{1}}\frac{\partial g_{I}}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{v_{1}}\frac{\partial h_{R}}{\partial t} = -\frac{1}{v_{2}}\frac{\partial g_{T}}{\partial t}

Now, integrate both sides with respect to time. The first term is really

-\frac{1}{v_{1}}\int\frac{\partial g_{I}(-v_{1}t)}{\partial t}dt

I just want to do this integral explicitly, to convince myself that the equation I ought to be getting is obvious... I am making some silly mistake each time with it...
 
Hi!

OK, explicitly I think your integral would be (ignoring the first constant):
<br /> \int\frac{\partial g_{I}(-v_{1}t)}{\partial t}dt=<br /> \int -v_1\, g&#039;_I(-v_{1}t)dt<br />
using the chain rule (yes if you want to write out the detalis we need it). Now putting x=-v1 t, and with dt=-dx/v1
<br /> =\int -v_1\, g&#039;_I(x)\frac{-dx}{v_1}<br /> =\int g&#039;_I(x) dx<br /> =g_I(x)+C=g_I(-v_1 t)+C<br />

But this I think we can see directly also since by definition the primitive function of the derivative gives the same function back... Hope I got the details correct.
 
Hi Andrew

Thanks...I understand my mistake now. I was factoring out the 1/v1 term without a multiplicative v1 term so I would get something like 1/v1 squared :rolleyes:

Cheers
Vivek
 
Back
Top