B Does Acceleration Depend on Instantaneous Velocity Changes?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Carbon273
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Acceleration, whether average or instantaneous, is fundamentally dependent on changes in instantaneous velocity. Average acceleration is calculated as the change in velocity over a specific time interval, while instantaneous acceleration represents this change as the time interval approaches zero, effectively becoming the slope of the velocity versus time graph. The discussion highlights that many physics textbooks do not explicitly clarify this relationship, which can lead to confusion. The principles of differential calculus underpin this concept, emphasizing the importance of continuity and differentiability in physical relationships. Overall, understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate interpretations in physics.
Carbon273
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
This question is not really a problem but a conversation starter. I am studying physics for the fun of it and I do have a quick question. Does acceleration regardless if it is average or instantaneous depend upon the change in the instantaneous velocity? The reason I asked that is because most books that I have seen does not specify the velocity to being instantaneous (hence why I underlined it). Most books just say the change of velocity over time is the cause with no specification. I know this is nitpicky and an obvious question but it has been bothering me. Thanks for the help in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Carbon273 and welcome to PF.

Carbon273 said:
Does acceleration regardless if it is average or instantaneous depend upon the change in the instantaneous velocity?
Yes. Average acceleration is the change in velocity (final minus initial instantaneous velocity) divided by the time interval over which this change takes place. Instantaneous acceleration is the same ratio but in the limit that the time interval becomes infinitesimally small, i.e. it is the slope of the velocity vs. time graph at some specific time.
 
  • Like
Likes Carbon273 and Delta2
kuruman said:
Hi Carbon273 and welcome to PF.Yes. Average acceleration is the change in velocity (final minus initial instantaneous velocity) divided by the time interval over which this change takes place. Instantaneous acceleration is the same ratio but in the limit that the time interval becomes infinitesimally small, i.e. it is the slope of the velocity vs. time graph at some specific time.
That's interesting. Obviously, its an assumption the books wants you to have but clarification would help on their part. Thanks for the help.
 
kuruman said:
Instantaneous acceleration is the same ratio but in the limit that the time interval becomes infinitesimally small
This is the basis of differential calculus. It works for any relationship between variables where the function is "continuous and differentiable" within the limits you are considering. This actually means most basic ideas encountered in Physics except where the relationship 'goes to infinity' (very bad maths statement but it gives the message) or when there is a 'cusp' in the curve.
Whenever we do a set of measurements or spot calculations, we sort of assume that it's valid to draw a smooth curve through them and it's mostly ok for many Physics experiments. The magic word here is "LIMIT".
PS Phenomena involving Chaotic Behaviour cannot be treated this way because there is no continuous line relating Input and Output result.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top