Simple question on Laplace's Equation (electrostatics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the One Dimensional Laplace's Equation given specific boundary conditions. The user is unclear about the required equation for V[x] and how to apply the provided equations. It is emphasized that V[x] can be determined using the boundary conditions and the Laplace equation, which states that the second derivative of V must equal zero. To find V[x], one should set up the boundary value problem correctly and solve it systematically. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying mathematical principles to derive the solution.
Abdul.119
Messages
73
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider solutions to the One Dimensional Laplace's Equation in Cartesian Coordinates

Let the range of x be from x1 to x2 (x1 > x2) and the boundary conditions are V[x1] = V1 and V[x2] = V2

Find the equation for V[x]

Homework Equations


V[x] = 1/2 (V(x+a)+V(x-a))
V[x] = mx + b

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't understand what equation I'm asked for.. from what I know the slope m is the difference in V over the difference in x, and the b is V2*x1 - V1x2 / x1-x2. Do I just apply that here? what about the equation V[x] = 1/2 (V(x+a)+V(x-a)) ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are supposed to find V(x) using Laplaces equation ##\nabla^2V=0##
Do so ... start by writing down the 1D Laplaces equ as an appropriate boundary value problem, then solve the equation normally.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top