What Oscillates in Light and What Are the Units of Measurement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that in light, it is the electric and magnetic fields that oscillate, with the electric field measured in newtons per coulomb (N/C) or volts per meter (V/m), and the magnetic field measured in teslas. The oscillation of these fields creates electromagnetic waves, where the electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular to each other and the direction of wave propagation. High-frequency light carries more energy due to the proportional relationship between photon energy and frequency. In practical terms, light from non-coherent sources consists of a mixture of different frequencies, while coherent sources like lasers produce uniform waves. Understanding these oscillations and their measurements is crucial for studying electromagnetic phenomena.
nhmllr
Messages
183
Reaction score
1
I have a very simple question
We all know that high frequency light has more energy than low frequency
What IS oscillating, though?
What are the units of the x and y axis?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The electric and magnetic fields are what's oscillating.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
The electric and magnetic fields are what's oscillating.

What are those measured in? Force?
 
nhmllr said:
What are those measured in? Force?

Electric field has dimensions of force/charge. The units are N/C OR V/m

Magnetic field has units of Teslas. You can look here to see how a Tesla is defined in terms of other SI units:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_(unit )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nhmllr said:
I have a very simple question
We all know that high frequency light has more energy than low frequency
What IS oscillating, though?
What are the units of the x and y axis?

It might help if you first think of a very low frequency example of this. All EM waves share the same basic properties.
Imagine an electromagnet (straight coil /'solenoid'), switched on. It will have a familiar 'field line' pattern around it like a bar magnet. You could go to a point in space, nearby and draw a line parallel to this field line with length proportional to the field strength (a vector). Now swap the connections. The change will take some time to reach your measuring point but then the field vector will have changed direction. Keep alternating the connections (better still, make the alternations sinusoidal in time) and the (slightly delayed) vectors will vary sinusoidally. It so happens that your coil will also be producing a varying Electric field at your measurement point and this E vector will be at right angles to the H vector. This variation takes the form of a wave, propagating outwards, with the E and H fields at right angles to the direction of propagation.

With light, the same thing is happening - just faster. There is an extra complication for most sources of light and that is the light is produced by many non-coherent sources (atoms and molecules) so the wave at a point in space is a jumble of many different waves at slightly different frequencies but you can treat it, for many purposes (reflection at a surface, for instance) as if it were just one wave, as with a Radio wave. From a Laser, the waves are all 'in step' and we have a coherent beam - just like from a radio transmitter.

Each atom will release a specified amount of energy in the light it produces (a Quantum or Photon). As you say, the energy of each photon is proportional to the frequency. The Field vectors, however, are macroscopic quantities so they will be proportional to the total amount of light.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top