Simple Redox Balancing, need confirmation

  • Thread starter Thread starter AGNuke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the redox balancing of the reaction Cr2O72- + H2O2 → Cr3+ + O2. The attempt to balance the equation is Cr2O72- + 3H2O2 + 8H+ → 2Cr3+ + 3O2 + 7H2O, but the poster expresses uncertainty about its correctness. They highlight the complexity of balancing reactions involving hydrogen peroxide due to the simultaneous decomposition of H2O2 into oxygen and water. The poster acknowledges that while their approach may yield a mathematically correct result, it may not accurately reflect the actual chemical process occurring. The discussion concludes with the realization that there are multiple potential solutions due to the disproportionation of hydrogen peroxide.
AGNuke
Gold Member
Messages
455
Reaction score
9
Question
Cr2O72- + H2O2 → Cr3+ + O2

Attempt
Cr2O72- + 3H2O2 + 8H+ → 2Cr3+ + 3O2 + 7H2O

Is my attempt correct. I think I had lost my grip in redox balancing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Balancing reactions with hydrogen peroxide if oxygen and water are between products is always tricky, as these are products of the hydrogen peroxide decomposition. That means you can always combine your reaction with hydrogen decomposition reaction and you will still get something that is - from the formal point of view - correctly balanced, but it doesn't reflect any real reaction.

You can try to assume that oxygen produced has the sole source of hydrogen peroxide, that's the approach that yields correct results in the case of the reaction between hydrogen peroxide and permanganate. But just because it yields a correct result doesn't mean that's what is really happening - observed stoichiometry can agree with this approach just accidentally.

Compare http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ic00224a030
 
Yeah. This questions seems to have infinite solutions. That's the base equation I got. There's a parallel disproportionation of Hydrogen Peroxide going on, so I guess I screwed up nonetheless.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top