Simple sound intensity difficulty

AI Thread Summary
At a distance of 50 m from a jet engine, the sound intensity is measured at 10 W/m2, equating to a loudness of 130 dB. To reduce the intensity by a factor of 10 to 1 W/m2, calculations indicate a significant increase in distance from the source. The power of the jet engine is calculated to be approximately 314,159 watts, leading to a required distance of around 397,289 meters to achieve the desired intensity reduction. The discussion emphasizes that the focus should be on intensity rather than intensity level or loudness in these calculations. Ultimately, achieving a 10-fold reduction in intensity proves to be impractical given the required distance.
Vanessa23
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
According to the text, at a distance of 50 m from a jet engine, the sound intensity is 10 W/m2. This corresponds to a loudness (or an intensity level) of 130 dB. [You should convince yourself that this is true.] If you find the sound too loud and you want to reduce the intensity by a factor of 10, to what new distance (approximately) from the jet engine should you move to achieve this reduction?


I=P/Area

Intensity level = 10db*log(I/Io)


to find the power of the jet engine:
p=10*((50^2)*4pi)
=314159

a factor of 10 reduction would mean 13dB
13=10log(I/10^-12)
1.3=log(I)-log(10^-12)
-10.7=log(I)
I=10^-10.7

A=P/I
A= 314159/ 10^-10.7
A=1.57x10^16

1.57x10^16 = 4pi r^2
r=397289

so does that mean that you really can't make the intensity decrease by a factor of 10?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think dB need to come into the calculation; the question asks for a reduction in intensity, not in "intensity level" or loudness.

The requisite new level is a factor of 10 less than the first level of 10 W/m^-2, that is 1 W/m^-2.

Assuming the jet engine is on a plane surface and there are no reflections then the noise power is radiating through the surface of a hemisphere ...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top