Simple special relativity problem

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the lifetime of a pi meson moving at 0.95c and its decay distance as observed from Earth. The proper lifetime of the pi meson is 26.0 ns, which, when adjusted for relativistic effects, results in a dilated lifetime of approximately 83.3 ns. The calculated distance traveled before decay is about 23.74 meters, which is slightly lower than the textbook's stated 24.0 meters. The discussion highlights discrepancies between the calculated values and the textbook answers, suggesting that the textbook may contain an error. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of using precise values in calculations to achieve accurate results.
jethomas3182
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



From: http://www.phas.ubc.ca/~mcmillan/rqpdfs/1_relativity.pdf

The average lifetime of a pi meson in its own frame of reference is 26.0 ns. (This is its proper lifetime.)
If the pi meson moves with speed 0.95c with respect to the Earth, what is its lifetime as measured by an
observer at rest on Earth?

What is the average distance it travels before decaying as measured by an observer at rest on Earth?

Homework Equations



T=26 ns
v=.95c

t^2=T^2 + x^2
x=vt

The Attempt at a Solution



t^2 = T^2 + (vt)^2
t^2(1-v^2) = T^2
t^2(1-.95^2) = 26^2
t*sqrt(1-.95^2)=26
t=26/sqrt(1-.95^2) = 83.267 ns rounded to 83.3 ns Books answer: 83.3 ns

distance: x = vt = 83.3ns * 3*10^8 m/s = 24.99 m rounded to 25.0 Book's answer: 24.0

My answer is about 4% off.

83.267*.3=24.98
83.267*.29979=24.8

I got the median speed, but with halflife the median is mean*ln(2).

83.267*.29979/ln(2)=35.786 rounded to 35.8. Even worse.

Did the book make a typo, or am I missing something important?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pi meson does not fly with the speed of light.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
mfb said:
The pi meson does not fly with the speed of light.

Thank you! Somehow I looked right over that.
 
Reviewing this problem, I got

83.3*10^-9 * .95 * 3.0*10^8 = 23.74 meters

A more precise answer for the time is lower, a more precise number for lightspeed is lower. But the book's answer was 24.0, about 1% higher than my answer and their answer is claimed good to one part in 240 or so.

I don't see where I went wrong this time. It looks simple, but I don't see how to get it right.
 
Don't take the rounded value for the time, use a more precise one. This makes the distance even lower, however. 23.7 meters is the correct answer, rounding it to 24 is fine as well, giving 24.0 is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes jethomas3182
Thank you! I wasn't confident that the book had it wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top