Simple Supported Beams: Deflection at Supports?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jnlbctln
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams Deflection
AI Thread Summary
In a simply supported beam, the theoretical definition states that there is zero deflection at the supports. However, real-world conditions can lead to deflection if the ground support yields or if the support structure experiences crushing under load. While supports are typically assumed to be rigid, actual conditions may require modeling support flexibility as a spring to account for potential deflection. This approach complicates calculations and is often avoided unless necessary. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate structural analysis.
jnlbctln
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
If i have a simple suppoted beam, let's say for example 2 supports with overhanging loads at end and/or midspan. DOES IT ALWAYS HAVE zero deflection at the support? or are there times that there is deflection at those supports? :confused:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The definition of a "support" in a simply-supported beam bending problem is zero deflection.
 
Thanks! :D
 
jnlbctln said:
If i have a simple suppoted beam, let's say for example 2 supports with overhanging loads at end and/or midspan. DOES IT ALWAYS HAVE zero deflection at the support? or are there times that there is deflection at those supports? :confused:

Two things come to mind: 1) if the ground support for the supports give or 2) if the support structure gets somewhat crushed by the weight. Other than that, you assume the support structure does not give.
 
By definition, a support is assumed to be rigid unless something else is said about it. In reality, we know that nothing is truly rigid, and if you think support flexibility is a significant aspect of your problem, you should model the support as a spring (possibly non-linear, if you want to get fancy) to take flexibility into account. This usually complicates problems significantly, and is usually avoided if at all possible.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top