Simple Unit Vector Problem: Finding Parallel and Perpendicular Vectors

Click For Summary
To find the unit vector normal to the function f(x) = -3x^2 + 5 at the point (1,2), the slope at that point is determined by calculating the derivative, f'(1), rather than using an approximation from another point. The parallel vector is derived from the slope, resulting in <1, -3>, while the perpendicular vector is found by ensuring the dot product equals zero, yielding <3, 1>. To convert these vectors into unit vectors, their magnitudes are calculated and used for normalization. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the derivative for accurate slope determination and suggests that finding the parallel vector first simplifies the process of finding the perpendicular vector. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar problems in vector calculus.
hagobarcos
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the unit vector normal to the function f(x) = -3x^2 + 5 and the point (1,2)
and find a unit vector parallel, using f(x) and the point (1,2).

Homework Equations



How do I find the slope here? I attempted to just use the point (0,5), and then the given point (1,2),
resulting in a slope of -3/1 or -3.

And since a vector is sometimes a line between two points, used that to develop a form.
So vector parallel equals <1i, -3j>


The perpendicular would simply be pointing 90 degrees out.
So, after setting the dot product equal to zero, vector perp. equals <3,1>


Is this the right track?

The Attempt at a Solution



Then to find the unit vectors for the parallel bit and the perpendicular bit I divided by their magnitudes, sqrt(10).
Attached is a photo of what I did.
 

Attachments

  • Cal Hw 11.1.jpg
    Cal Hw 11.1.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 460
Physics news on Phys.org
(1,2) is a point on the graph. The slope at that point is the derivative of the function at 1. Your way of calculating the slope only yields an approximation of the true slope (i.e. the derivative of f at 1). The approximation is better if you choose the second point closer to (1,2). But you don't want an approximation, you want the exact value. You could choose an arbitrary point (x,f(x)) compute the approximate slope as (f(x)-2)/(x-1) and then let x go to 1, but instead of actually doing that, you should recognize that the result of this limit operation is by definition f'(1). You should calculate f'(1) the way you usually find derivatives.

I think it's easier to find a vector parallel to the graph at (1,2) than to find one that's perpendicular to it. So I would find the parallel one first, and then use it to find the perpendicular one.
 
Last edited:
Ohhhhhh! Right. *face palm* :D
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K