Simple vector-decomposition (fluid mechanics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the decomposition of the force vector πx in relation to an infinitesimal surface element dS in fluid mechanics. The original poster questions why the force is represented as πx rather than being directed along dS. A participant clarifies that the momentum flux vector, denoted as N_x, is not necessarily normal to the surface due to the fluid's velocity direction. They explain how to represent the momentum flux vector and its components relative to a surface of constant x, distinguishing between normal and tangential components. This highlights the complexity of fluid mechanics notation and the importance of understanding vector decomposition in this context.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am reading an introductory book on fluid mechanics (freely available on the WWW) and I came across this on page 10:

Consider an infinitesimal plane surface element, dS = ndS, located at point r. Here, dS is the area of the element, and n its unit normal. The fluid which lies on that side of the element toward which n points is said to lie on its positive side, and vice versa. The net flux of x-momentum across the element (in the direction of n) is πx · dS, which implies (from Newton’s second law of motion) that the fluid on the positive side of the surface element experiences a force πx ·dS in the x-direction due to short-range interaction with the fluid on the negative side.

I don't understand the underlined part. We have a force-vector πx, which we decompose to find the overlap with some surface element dS. Shouldn't the force entering dS be directed along dS, and not πx as the author claims?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:

Homework Statement


I am reading an introductory book on fluid mechanics (freely available on the WWW) and I came across this on page 10:



I don't understand the underlined part. We have a force-vector πx, which we decompose to find the overlap with some surface element dS. Shouldn't the force entering dS be directed along dS, and not πx as the author claims?

Thanks in advance.
It's hard to get past all this unusual notation, with the symbol n being used for two different things (momentum flux and normal), but I think I know what they are trying to say. Let \vec{N_x} represent the net momentum flux (vector) through a surface of constant x. This momentum flux vector is not necessarily normal to the surface, since the fluid velocity is not necessarily normal to the surface. We can represent this momentum flux vector by:
\vec{N_x}=ρv_xv_x\vec{i_x}+ρv_xv_y\vec{i_y}+ρv_xv_z\vec{i_z}
In this example, since the surface of interest is one of constant x, \vec{dS}=\vec{i_x}dS, the component of the momentum flux normal to the surface is ρv_xv_x\vec{i_x}, and the component of the momentum flux tangential to the surface is ρv_xv_y\vec{i_y}+ρv_xv_z\vec{i_z}.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top