Simple velocity/motion question

  • Thread starter Thread starter stuarthin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The experiment aimed to investigate the relationship between the speed of a dynamics trolley and its stopping distance by varying the slope angle with books. Unexpected results were observed, with peak velocities fluctuating rather than consistently increasing with added weight. The recorded peak velocities ranged from 59 cm/s to 106 cm/s, while stopping distances varied significantly, indicating a complex interaction between speed and distance. Potential factors affecting the results include air resistance and friction, which may have influenced the trolley's performance. Understanding these variables is crucial for drawing accurate conclusions from the experiment.
stuarthin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm having some problem with a few results I gathered from a series of tests and am afraid I am missing something and/or misunderstanding some basic concepts.

My method for this test was to run a dynamics trolley down a slope at different angles, each angle being an amount of books starting from 3 books (Test 1) and ending with 7 books (Test 5).

My problem is, why are my results so...unexpected? Basically the higher the books, the greater the velocity right? Here are my peak velocities for the 5 tests:

T1 : 59cm/s
T2 : 94cm/s
T3 : 106cm/s
T4 : 87.5 cm/s
T5 : 102cm/s

Stopping distances:

T1 : 18.5 cm
T2 : 55 cm
T3 : 65 cm
T4 : 41 cm
T5 : 59 cm

The aim of this experiment is to determine whether or not speed is related to the stopping distance of a car. I intended to explain this statement throughout a series of test determining the speed, distance, and acceleration of a dynamics trolley and using data provided to solve the investigation.

Independent variable : Speed of Trolley
Dependent variable: Distance (stopping)



My attempt at solution: Possibly where the trolley stopped at the end of each test. I'm really not sure and was hoping somebody would point out the answer for me. I'm completely stumped as to why the peak velocity does not go higher and instead sort of jumps around.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you should consider the air resistance (the drag force) and the friction to come out with a reasonable explanation that is consistent with your data.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top