Simplified form of Voltage Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the voltage formula related to electric fields, specifically the equation Vb-Va = -∫_a^b E dl. A user questions the simplification for a positively charged conducting sphere, suggesting an alternative expression. They initially express confusion about the integral limits and the resulting formula. Ultimately, the user resolves their misunderstanding and acknowledges their error. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying integral limits in voltage calculations.
Typhon4ever
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
In my book it gives the relationship between voltage and electric field as Vb-Va= -\int _a^{b} E dl which for a positively charged conducting sphere Q simplifies to \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0} (\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{a}) my questions is that shouldn't it be \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0} (\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b})? The integral turns into \int _b^{a} what am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nvmind I got it I feel stupid lol
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top