B Simplifying an exponential with a square root

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I have the expression ##e^{\frac{1}{2} \log|2x-1|}##. I am tempted to just say that this is equal to ##\sqrt{2x-1}## and be done with it. However, I am not sure how to justify this, since it seems that then the domains of the two functions would be different, since the latter would be all real numbers while the former would be ##x \ge \frac{1}{2}##.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Was there something wrong with ##\sqrt{|2x-1|}##?
 
Orodruin said:
Was there something wrong with ##\sqrt{|2x-1|}##?
Well, I then need to take the derivative of the resulting expression, and I don't see how to take the derivative of ##\sqrt{|2x-1|}##
 
Split it into cases. Or set ##y = 2x -1## and differentiate ##\sqrt{\lvert y \rvert}## using the chain rule, remembering that ##\lvert y \rvert## is not differentiable when ##y = 0##
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Well, I then need to take the derivative of the resulting expression, and I don't see how to take the derivative of ##\sqrt{|2x-1|}##
Regardless of how you do things, your function will not be differentiable in x=1/2.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top