Simplifying the Factorial: How is it Done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nitai108
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial
nitai108
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Can somebody please explain to me this simplification and how it's done?

\frac{n!}{(2n)!} = \frac{1}{(2n)(2n-1)...(n+1)}


Thanks a lot.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The original denominator is

<br /> (2n)! = (2n)(2n-1) \cdots (n+1) n!<br />

so things simply cancel.
 
statdad said:
The original denominator is

<br /> (2n)! = (2n)(2n-1) \cdots (n+1) n!<br />

so things simply cancel.

Thanks for the help. I still don't understand the (n + 1), where does it come from? I've tried to search the net, and my textbooks but I never found examples of (xn)!, only n! = n(n-1)!.
 
Think about the meaning of (2n)!. It contains all the integers from 2n down to 1. When you write out the entire factorial you must write down each one of those integers, and n + 1 is one of them.

As a specific (but small enough to write down) example, look what happens for n = 4. This clearly means n+1 = 5, which is the number I've placed in a box.

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \frac{n!}{(2n)!} &amp; =\frac{4!}{8!} = \frac{4 \cdot 3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1}{6 \cdot \boxed{5} \cdot 4 \cdot 3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1}\\<br /> &amp; = \frac{1}{8 \cdot 7 \cdot 6 \cdot \boxed{5}}= \frac{1}{(2n)\cdots (n+1)}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Basically, when you write out the factorials in numerator and denominator, the final n factors cancel. Hope this helps.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top