Simulation of internal mechanics of materials of high restitution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a 1D numerical simulation designed to explore the internal mechanics of collision impacts in materials. The simulation models two objects, one moving and one stationary, using basic elements and dynamic links to simulate repulsive forces during collisions. Results show that energy and impulse are conserved, with some energy converting into vibrational energy within the stationary object. The main inquiry revolves around understanding how high restitution materials, like superballs, manage to reflect most energy without significant conversion to vibrational energy. The conclusion indicates that high restitution occurs when the internal link stiffness is much greater than the stiffness of the collision, suggesting a relationship between internal and collision stiffness ratios and restitution.
xortdsc
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hello,

just for some basic understanding I wrote a (1D) numerical simulation to investigate the internal mechanics of collision impact in different materials.
For a start I work with a really simple model which consists of:
- basic elements (circles of fixed radius and mass and their current position and velocity)
- links between elements (hookes springs with fixed k and desired distance)
- when 2 elements overlap a dynamic link is added between them for the current timestep to simulate repulsive forces on collision

All computations are to be performed on each element or link individually, so it is like simulating "huge simplified atoms". After all I want to see how macroscopic effects emerge from microscopic ones.

Now the scenario is simple. The starting condition is:
- An "object" on the left consisting of a single element moving with velocity 1 to the right
- An "object" on the right consisting of 2 linked elements (with initial separation of 1) which is stationary
- the masses of all elements are set to 1, so the left object has a total mass of 1 and the right object has a total mass of 2
Code:
Left Object
  Element x=-0.1, v=1.0
  Overall x=-0.1, v=1.0
  Energy pot=0.0, kin=0.5, vib=0.0, tot=0.5
Right Object
  Element x=1.0, v=0.0
  Element x=2.0, v=0.0
  Overall x=1.5, v=0.0
  Energy pot=0.0, kin=0.0, vib=0.0, tot=0.0
Total energy=0.5, impulse=1.0
Since there is no internal friction of any sort, energy and impulse (in any case) should be conserved and it is. The simulation goes mostly as expected: the left body moves towards the right one, collides, bounces off and returns with some of its momentum transferred to the right body.
Looking at the numbers I get the following at the end of the simulation (post collision):
Code:
Left Object
  Element x=0.01978705, v=-0.13026643
  Overall x=0.01978705, v=-0.13026643
  Energy pot=0.0, kin=0.008484671, vib=0.0, tot=0.008484671
Right Object
  Element x=1.4102714, v=0.56778127
  Element x=2.4689417, v=0.56248504
  Overall x=1.9396065, v=0.56513315
  Energy pot=0.0, kin=0.3193755, vib=0.1721171, tot=0.49149257
Total energy=0.49997723, impulse=0.9999999
(This is just a snapshot as the velocities and relative displacements of the elements of the right object would oscillate, while the overall velocity of both elements is constant)

Now as you can see energy as well as impulse is conserved (disregarding the tiny numerical error). Also some of the energy is transformed into vibrational energy inside the right object (its 2 elements are vibrating relative to each other). This is also the reason, why the final velocities are not the expected -1/3, +2/3 as an impulse-based collision response with CoR=1 would suggest as some kinetic energy is converted into vibrational energy of the right body.
Changing the stiffness of the springs will yield the same results, the only difference is the vibrational frequency, which seems okay.

Now the actual question would be: How do high restitution materials (e.g. a superball with CoR of about 0.95 or so) reflect almost all energy without converting it into vibrational energy ? What would be the property of such material in that simple model ? What would need to change in the simulation to get something close to a fully elastic collision ? Using internal friction does not solve the problem, because as it reduces the internal vibration that energy is lost.

Does anybody have some insight into this ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out. So to answer my own question: High restitution happens if the internal links are very stiff compared to the stiffness of the collision.
Restitution appears to depend solely on the ratio k_internal/k_collision. The remainder of the energy, if restitution is less then one, goes into internal vibrational energy.

Is there an equation which translates these quantities ? So I could compute the ratio of internal to collision stiffness from restitution and vice versa ?
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top