I Do operators A and Hamiltonian share a set of eigenfunctions if they commute?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter dyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenfunctions
dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
If time evolution of a general ket is given by | Ψ > = e-iHt/ħ | Ψ (0) > where H is the Hamiltonian. If i have a eigenbasis consisting of 2 bases |a> and |b> of a general Hermitian operator A and i write e-iHt/ ħ |a> = e-iEat/ ħ |a> and e-iHt/ħ |b> = e-iEbt/ ħ |b> ; does this mean that operator A and the Hamiltonian share a set of eigenfunctions ? ie they commute ?

And how would the time evolution of a ket be written if its operator did not commute with the Hamiltonian ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##E_a \neq E_b## then ##A## and ##H## share the same eigenvectors. If on the other hand ##E_a = E_b##, any linear combination of ##|a\rangle## and ##|b\rangle## is an eigenvector of ##H## but obviously they cannot be an eigenvector of ##A## as well since ##a\neq b##.
dyn said:
And how would the time evolution of a ket be written if its operator did not commute with the Hamiltonian ?
Expand the eigenvector of ##A## into the eigenvectors of ##H##.
 
If A is a general operator and Ea ≠ Eb then why do A and H share the same eigenvectors ?
 
If ##[A,H]=0## and the spectrum of ##H## is non-degenerate, then for any pair of eigenvectors ##|a\rangle## and ##|b\rangle## of ##H##
$$
\langle a|[A,H]|b\rangle = 0 \\
(E_a-E_b) \langle a|A|b\rangle = 0
$$
This means when ##|a\rangle \neq |b\rangle## thus ##E_a -E_b \neq 0##, the scalar ##\langle a|A|b\rangle = 0##. That is, the matrix of ##A## is diagonal with respect to the basis of the eigenstates of ##H## and the two operators have the same set of eigenvectors.
 
  • Like
Likes dyn
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top