Simultaneous events separated by distance and time

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    distance Events
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding how events can be separated by time in one frame and by distance in another, particularly in the context of special relativity. Participants clarify that while events may appear simultaneous in one frame, they can still have a spatial separation, leading to different time separations in another frame. The mathematical relationships governing these transformations are explored, including the spacetime interval and Lorentz transformations. One participant expresses difficulty in visualizing these events on a spacetime diagram, emphasizing that the events can be plotted as long as the spacetime interval conditions are met. The conversation highlights the complexities of understanding simultaneity and distance in relativistic contexts.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1715731097106.png

Does anybody please know how events can be separated by time in one frame and distance in another? This notation does not seem physically correct to me.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this problem,
View attachment 345259
Does anybody please know how events can be separated by time in one frame and distance in another? This notation does not seem physically correct to me.

Thanks!
Here is a version of the problem with numbers in it. However, my confusion about events in still the same (that is, how can the events can be separated by time in one frame and distance in another). Thanks for any help!
1715753391609.png
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, my confusion about events in still the same (that is, how can the events can be separated by time in one frame and distance in another
They are separated by distance in both frames, but simultaneous in just one frame. You might find it helpful to think about what the answer to part #d will look like fr this to be possible.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
They have a distance separation and a time separation in both frames. You are given that the distance separation in your frame is a and the time separation in your frame is 0 (because they are simultaneous in your frame). You are given that the time separation in the other frame is b, and asked to find the distance separation in the other frame.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
Thank you for your replies @Nugatory and @phyzguy !

Sorry I'm still confused. My working is,

(a) ##\Delta s^2 = \Delta (s')^2##

##\Delta x^2 - (c \Delta t)^2 = \Delta (x')^2 - (c \Delta t')^2##

Subing in the numbers gives,

##\sqrt{9^2 - 9} = \Delta x'##

##\sqrt{72} = \Delta x'##

(b) ##x' = γ(x - vt)##
##\Delta x' = γ(\Delta x - v \Delta t)## we know ##\Delta t = 0##, thus plugging in values from (a),
##\frac{9}{\sqrt{72}} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}##
##\sqrt{-c^2 (\frac{9}{\sqrt{72}})^2 - 1} = v##

(c) Events cannot be causally related since ##\Delta (s')^2 = \Delta s^2 > 0## so ##|\Delta x| > |c\Delta t|##

However, I don't know how to draw the spacetime diagram. I think we have to draw the events such that ##(\Delta x, c \Delta t) = (9,0)## and ##(\Delta x', c \Delta t') = (\sqrt{72}, 1 \times 10^{-8} c)##
1715819173280.png

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your replies @Nugatory and @phyzguy !

Sorry I'm still confused. My working is,

(a) ##\Delta s^2 = \Delta (s')^2##

##\Delta x^2 - (c \Delta t)^2 = \Delta (x')^2 - (c \Delta t')^2##

Subing in the numbers gives,

##\sqrt{9^2 - 9} = \Delta x'##

##\sqrt{72} = \Delta x'##

(b) ##x' = γ(x - vt)##
##\Delta x' = γ(\Delta x - v \Delta t)## we know ##\Delta t = 0##, thus plugging in values from (a),
##\frac{9}{\sqrt{72}} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}##
##\sqrt{-c^2 (\frac{9}{\sqrt{72}})^2 - 1} = v##

(c) Events cannot be causally related since ##\Delta (s')^2 = \Delta s^2 > 0## so ##|\Delta x| > |c\Delta t|##

However, I don't know how to draw the spacetime diagram. I think we have to draw the events such that ##(\Delta x, c \Delta t) = (9,0)## and ##(\Delta x', c \Delta t') = (\sqrt{72}, 1 \times 10^{-8} c)##
View attachment 345328
Thanks!
Update: I made some silly algebraic mistakes in the last post. I have fixed them now and have go have solved (a), (b) and (c). However, I'm just stuck on finding the spacetime diagram now. I'm not sure where to plot the events.

My thinking is that we can plot the events anywhere as long as the spacetime interval is satisfied from (a). This is similar to trying to plot points on a Cartesian x and y plane given the Pythagorean distance.

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top