Sizing Chamber for Pressure Reduction - CO2 Essential Oil Extraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter andyhull77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Reduction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the appropriate chamber size for pressure reduction in a CO2 essential oil extraction setup. The user seeks guidance on how to calculate the volume needed to drop pressure from 1000 psi to the 200-300 psi range while operating at high temperatures. Key factors influencing the chamber size include the initial vacuum, CO2 delivery method, and flow control. The user aims to replace two smaller separation vessels with one larger vessel to improve efficiency. Assistance in calculating the vessel size based on pressure and temperature differentials is requested.
andyhull77
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am new here and have a question about sizing a chamber for pressure reduction.

I am going to run CO2 75 degree at 1000 psi into a chamber that is 150+ degrees. What size chamber...or what volume rather do I need to drop down to the 2-300psi range?

I am sure this is a vague or improper question. But it is for a CO2 essential oil extraction setup and cannot find the answer anywhere.

Thanks

Andy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. It is a vague question. The pressure in the chamber will depend on how much CO2 is placed inside. Is the chamber initially evacuated before the CO2 is admitted? How is the CO2 delivered to the chamber? Does it come through a pipeline or from another container which is close to the chamber? How is the flow of the CO2 controlled? Is the chamber insulated?
 
Steamking, Thanks for the reply.

The system is a closed loop system. There is a vacuum on the system before the CO2 is added so it fills the entire system before pressurization. The CO2 is run through plant material at pressure removing the essential oils from it. The pressurized oil laden CO2 is and sprayed into a larger heated vessel atomizing it and subsequently separating the oil from the gas. This is where the pressure drop happens. Going from a 1/4" line at 1000 psi and 75 degrees into a 6" vessel at 150 degrees.

The current machine we have goes into a smaller separation vessel at the same temp. But has 2 vessels. One for the primary separation and a secondary vessel "just in case" it needs a little more separation. I want to go to a larger vessel at a much higher temp, assuming there will be a more efficient separation of the particles due to the greater pressure drop and higher temperature allowing me to use maybe 1 - 6" vessel as opposed to 2 - 4" vessels.

I do not know the calculation for the sizing of the vessel based on the pressure and temperature differential. I would like to be able to use 1 larger vessel to take the place of the 2 smaller ones basically.

Thanks for any help.

Andy
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top