Sketch of curves defined by parameters

smoothman
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
silly question. didnt know where it was meant to go so i just put it here as safest option:)

suppose a curve C is defined by, r(t) = (sint, cost) with 0 \leq t \leq 2\pi

if a sketch of C was required then would you simply just draw the graphs for sint and cost?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Based on the equation, it's appears that polar coordinates are being used, where r is the length of the vector, and t is the angle of the vector from the x axis. Sin(t) and Cos(t) are the x and y coordinates of the polar vector. This is a single graph, not two.
 
Last edited:
If r(t)=(sint, cost) then x component is sint, y component is cost
which means
x^2+y^2=1 as you know it is a circle
but t is not an angle of the vector from x axis( it is valid for (cost,sint))
For our curve if we take t=0 , we obtain the pt (0,1) which is on the y axis
Therefore in our case t is angle from +y -axis

didnt know where it was meant to go so i just put it here as safest option:)
Not sure but this type of questions are generally discussed at homework section
 
Just thought that a good idea in order to graph the curve C which you have, as Jeff said, written in polar coords. ,if you do not see of-hand how to graph it, would be to switch back (if/where possible) between polars, to Cartesian coordinates, which are the coordinates I think most people are familiar with in terms of doing graphs.

The coordinate change is given by:

x=rcost
y=rsint

and the inverse maps.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top