Sketch the graph of the function f(x)=square root X

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on sketching the graph of the function f(x) = √x and its inverse functions. Participants initially struggle with the correct values for the inverse function and its negative reflection. The correct approach involves swapping x and y values for the inverse and applying the negative sign for the reflection. The reflection line for the transformation is y = x, indicating that the graphs of the functions are reflections of each other across this line. Clarity is achieved as participants refine their understanding of the inverse and its graphical representation.
Aka
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
a) sketch the graph of the function f(x)=square root X
b) on the same set of axes, graph y=f^-1(x), y=-f^-1(-x)

so I did a chart, but i don't know if its right...I don't think its right :confused:

f(x)=squareroot x

X Y
0 0
1 1
4 2
9 3

y=f^-1(x)

X Y
0 0
1 -1
4 -2
9 -3

y=-f^-1(-x)

X Y
0 0
-1 1
-4 2
-9 3

and i don't understand the question
if the two graph of y=-f^-1(-x) is drawn from the graph of y=f(x) by a single reflection, what is the equation of the reflection line?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The graph of the inverse function will be the reflection of the function about the line y = x which amounts to exchanging the values of x and y in your tables and adjusting accordingly for the negative of the inverse.
 
Aka said:
a) sketch the graph of the function f(x)=square root X
b) on the same set of axes, graph y=f^-1(x), y=-f^-1(-x)

so I did a chart, but i don't know if its right...I don't think its right :confused:

f(x)=squareroot x

X Y
0 0
1 1
4 2
9 3
Yes, this is correct.

y=f^-1(x)

X Y
0 0
1 -1
4 -2
9 -3
No, this is y= -f(x), not y= f-1(x), the inverse function.
To get the inverse function, just swap the x and y columns.
What is the "opposite" of square root?

[/quote]y=-f^-1(-x)

X Y
0 0
-1 1
-4 2
-9 3 [/quote]
see above.

and i don't understand the question
if the two graph of y=-f^-1(-x) is drawn from the graph of y=f(x) by a single reflection, what is the equation of the reflection line?

Thanks
I don't understand "the two graph". Are you sure that you have copied the problem correctly? Draw the graphs as you were told two. Is there some line so that "flipping" the first graph over that line gives the second graph?
 
^ Thanks
Are you sure that you have copied the problem correctly?

sorry, I did not coppy it corrently, it's not supposed to have the two in it :P

so is it like this?

y=f^-1(x)
X Y
0 0
1 1
2 4
3 9

y=f^-1(-x)
X Y
0 0
-1 1
-2 4
-3 9
 
Aka said:
^ Thanks


sorry, I did not coppy it corrently, it's not supposed to have the two in it :P

so is it like this?

y=f^-1(x)
X Y
0 0
1 1
2 4
3 9

y=f^-1(-x)
X Y
0 0
-1 1
-2 4
-3 9

Yes, that's better. But, I believe you forgot the negative in front of the f^-1 in the second equation. Shouldn't that be y = -f^-1(-x)?
 
^ yes, it should

so the y values will be negative
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top