Sketching loci in the complex plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around sketching complex numbers z1 and z2 in the complex plane, specifically focusing on their geometric relationships with a fixed point z0 = a + i0. Participants explore the equations z2 − z1 = (z1 − a)ei2π/3 and a − z2 = (z2 − z1)i2π/3, which suggest a rotational symmetry of 2π/3. The conversation highlights the geometric interpretation of multiplying complex numbers by ei2π/3, indicating that this operation results in a rotation while maintaining magnitude. Ultimately, the conclusion is reached that the solutions correspond to the roots of unity, confirming the relationships among the points in the complex plane.
jj364
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Make a sketch of the complex plane showing a typical pair of complex numbers
z1 and z2


Describe the geometrical figure whose vertices
are z1, z2 and z0 = a + i0.


Homework Equations



z2 − z1 = (z1 − a)ei2π/3

a − z2 = (z2 − z1)i2π/3

where a is a real positive constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



I really am not sure what to do on this question, my initial thoughts were that the solution would look like 3 lines in the complex plane all 2π/3 apart so that it would look like the solution to a roots of unity question.

I tried to rearrange to give z2 in terms of a which yielded

z2(1+e2πi/3 - e2πi/3/(1+e2πi/3) = a(1+e4πi/3/(1+e2πi/3))

But to be honest I really don't know where I am going with this!
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're missing an "e" in your second "relevant equation" and that you mean
a − z2 = (z2 − z1) ei2π/3
instead. If that's right, you might try to interpret geometrically what multiplying a complex number by ei2π/3 means.
 
e2πi/3=-1/2 +i√3/2 so multiplying by it would change the real and imaginary components accordingly.

So would it be best to split into real and imaginary components so z1=x1=iy1 and z2=x2+iy2, then substitute these into the equations?
Which i think gives

z2=1/2(x1+a) + i3y1√3 /2
 
jj364 said:
e2πi/3=-1/2 +i√3/2 so multiplying by it would change the real and imaginary components accordingly.

That doesn't really say a lot. What does such a multiplication f(z) = ze2πi/3 look like geometrically? If you sketch 1 and f(1) in the complex plane, how could you describe the geometrical operation that takes you from 1 to f(1)? How about 1/2 and f(1/2)? How about 1+i and f(1+i)? If you can discover some similarity, you can apply this knowledge to your original problem.
 
Ok, so does it rotate them by 2π/3 keeping the same magnitude?

But I'm still struggling to work out my problem from this. Do I need to just think about it or can I actually solve the problem using the equations, because I've tried eliminating to no avail?
 
Actually I think I might have worked it out. I think it is just the solutions to z^3=1 so

1, e\frac{2\pi i}{3}, e\frac{4\pi i}{3}

I tried it for the equations and it worked, is this right? They are all rotations of 2pi/3 of each other so it does make sense.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top