Sketching this function for potential energy of two atoms in a molecule

Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The potential energy of two atoms in a molecule can sometimes be approximated by the Morse function, where r is the distance between the two atoms and A, R, And positive constants with S<<R. Sketch this function for 0<r<∞...

##U(r) = A ( (e^{(R-r)/(S)}-1)^2 - 1) ##

This is just one part of the problem but it is the part bothering me so I'll leave out the rest of the problem. This should be an easy problem, as indicated by the (*).

The Attempt at a Solution



##U(r) = A ( (e^{(R-r)/(S)}-1)^2 - 1) ##
I rewrite ##e^{(R-r)S}## as ##e^{R/S-r/S}##

The only way I can think about graphing this is to ignore all other things except for ##e^{R/S-r/S}## and manipulating R/S

Since S<<R, ##R/S→∞##

But then that just gives me nonsense! What else can I do?

Expanding ##(e^{R/S-r/S})^2## does not help either. Ignoring all constants and values except for r does not help either because ##e^{R/S-r/S}## = e^-r which will give me the wrong sketch.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Plot U/A as a function of r/R, with R/S as a parameter for each curve. Try a value of R/S equal to 10 to start with. Play with different values of R/S.
 
Chestermiller said:
Plot U/A as a function of r/R, with R/S as a parameter for each curve. Try a value of R/S equal to 10 to start with. Play with different values of R/S.

As a function of r/R? I'm not following and I don't understand the motivation behind this. =/
 
Nano-Passion said:
As a function of r/R? I'm not following and I don't understand the motivation behind this. =/

You'd like to be able to display all the information about this function on a single graph. You can do this if you use the dimensionless variables U/A, r/R, and R/S. When r/R = 1, U/A = -1; thus, this point should be the same on all the curves, irrespective of R/S. Rewrite the equation in the form:

(U/A) = (exp(-R/S (r/R -1)) -1)2 -1

You can explore the behavior in the region r close to R by expanding in a Taylor series in (1-r/R):

(U/A) ~ ((1 - (R/S)(1-r/R)) -1)2 -1 = -1 + (R/S)2(1-r/R)2

At very small r/R, you approach

(U/A) ~ exp (2R/S)

At very large r/R, you approach

(U/A) ~ -2 exp(-R/S (r/R))
 
Chestermiller said:
You'd like to be able to display all the information about this function on a single graph. You can do this if you use the dimensionless variables U/A, r/R, and R/S. When r/R = 1, U/A = -1; thus, this point should be the same on all the curves, irrespective of R/S. Rewrite the equation in the form:

(U/A) = (exp(-R/S (r/R -1)) -1)2 -1

You can explore the behavior in the region r close to R by expanding in a Taylor series in (1-r/R):

(U/A) ~ ((1 - (R/S)(1-r/R)) -1)2 -1 = -1 + (R/S)2(1-r/R)2

At very small r/R, you approach

(U/A) ~ exp (2R/S)

At very large r/R, you approach

(U/A) ~ -2 exp(-R/S (r/R))

Thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top