Skier down a slope and potential energy

AI Thread Summary
A skier descends a 100 m slope, starting with potential energy (PE) at rest and ending with kinetic energy (KE) at a speed of 20 m/s. To find the percentage of initial potential energy lost, one must calculate the initial PE at the top and the KE at the bottom. The energy lost is determined by the difference between these two values, factoring in losses due to friction and resistance. The formula for energy loss can be expressed as 1 - (KE/PE), which gives the percentage of initial energy lost. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in this scenario.
rkslperez04
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

A women skis down a slope 100 m high. Her speed at the foot of the slope is 20 m/s. What percentage of her intial potential engery is lost?


okkk.. here is what I get:

My instructor mentioned this was a Ef/Ei problem. (effientcy final divided by effientcy intial)

my book uses the formula: 1 - (KE2/PE2)

Im confused where the one came from?

then...

I understand we have PE at the top of the hill only being we are to assume she is at rest... so no KE. So does that mean we no PE at the bottom only KE...


Im confused.. can someone explain this to me in laymens terms so I can rework the problem. Is there an easier way to solve this.??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rkslperez04 said:
Here is the question:

A women skis down a slope 100 m high. Her speed at the foot of the slope is 20 m/s. What percentage of her intial potential engery is lost?


okkk.. here is what I get:

My instructor mentioned this was a Ef/Ei problem. (effientcy final divided by effientcy intial)

my book uses the formula: 1 - (KE2/PE2)

Im confused where the one came from?

then...

I understand we have PE at the top of the hill only being we are to assume she is at rest... so no KE. So does that mean we no PE at the bottom only KE...


Im confused.. can someone explain this to me in laymens terms so I can rework the problem. Is there an easier way to solve this.??
Yes, you are on the right track. She has only PE at the top. At the bottom, no PE, just KE. Calculate her PE at the top. Calculate her KE at the bottom. How much energy was lost (due to friction, snow resistance, air resistance, etc.)? What percentage is that of the initial energy? The result is the same as (1 - E_f/E_i), where E_f and E_i are the final and initial energy, respectively. I don't understand either where the book formula came from.
 
The amount of energy that was lost is

PE_t - KE_b

where t refers to top and b to bottom. The fraction of energy lost will be

\frac{PE_t - KE_b}{PE_t}

which comes to

1 - \frac{KE_b}{PE_t}

the percentage will just be this fraction times one hundred.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top