Skipping parts of Landau\Lifshitz Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cpsinkule
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics parts
AI Thread Summary
Skipping sections on molecular vibrations and scattering theory in Landau and Lifshitz's Mechanics may not hinder immediate understanding of higher-level topics like Quantum Field Theory (QFT) or Advanced General Relativity, as foundational concepts can be grasped without them. However, the discussion emphasizes that these topics are interconnected within physics, suggesting that a comprehensive understanding could enhance overall knowledge. Taking the time to engage with all sections is encouraged, as it fosters a deeper intellectual and emotional appreciation for the material. Impatience in skipping content may ultimately slow down understanding of complex subjects. A thorough reading of the book is recommended for long-term benefits in advanced studies.
cpsinkule
Messages
174
Reaction score
24
I've recently picked up Machanics by Landau and Lifshitz to brush up on Lagrangian\Hamiltonian mechanics, but this book contains a huge chunk of sections on molecular vibrations\scattering theory\collisions etc etc. My question would be: Will skipping these sections leave me at a disadvantage when I pick up on higher level topics such as QFT et al? My experience so far is that it is not needed, at least for General Relativity and elementary Quantum Mechanics. I will go back in the future and cover those sections, it just seems like it is unnecessarily time consuming to learn those applications if my main goal is learning QFT\Advanced GR and the like.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are no two areas of physics that are disjoint. While it may seem inefficient and unnecessary to read those parts, you will benefit greatly be taking the time to first, convince yourself intelectually and emotionally that those topics are important and arrive at this conclusion yourself, and second, to sit down and read and understand that small book the whole way through. "Impatience slows understanding."
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top