Slanted Gravity: A boy on a hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anaxerzia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Hill
AI Thread Summary
A boy on a hill needs to determine the optimal angle to throw a rock for maximum range, considering the hill's slope. The proposed method involves treating the ground as flat and adjusting the gravity vector accordingly, leading to the time of flight and horizontal distance calculations. The derived angle for maximum range is θ = (90 - φ)/2, which is questioned for correctness and elegance. The discussion confirms that the method used is valid, although it suggests a more precise mathematical language could enhance clarity. Participants are encouraged to seek a more elegant solution to the problem.
Anaxerzia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A boy stands at the peak of a hill which slopes downward uniformly at angle \phi. At what angle \theta from the horizontal should he throw a rock so that is has the greatest range.

(Source: Introduction to Mechanics by Kleppner and Kolenkow)

Homework Equations


I suppose trig identities, vectors, and the general one dimensional kinematics would help (x_0+v_0t+a_0t^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Now my solution went like this: Pretend the ground is flat and that instead gravity is at an angle \phi-90), and that the ball is launch at angle \theta+\phi My idea was to decompose both the gravity vector and the vector of the launch into vertical and horizontal vectors, look at the time it takes to hit the ground using the vertical component and then use that time to plug into see how far it goes in the horizontal component. Then, simply maximize that with respect to \theta. If you draw it out and do all that, you get:

untitledJPG.png


Vertical components:
Initial Velocity: v_0\sin{(\theta+\phi)}
Acceleration from Gravity: -g\cos{\phi}

Horizontal components:
Initial Velocity: v_0\cos{(\theta+\phi)}
Acceleration: +g\sin{\phi}

Time to hit ground:
0=v_0t\sin{(\theta+\phi)}-\frac{1}{2}gt^2\cos{\phi}\Rightarrow
t=\frac{2v_0\sin{\theta+\phi}}{g\cos{\phi}}

Now plug that t into:
v_0t\cos{(\theta+\phi)}+\frac{1}{2}gt^2\sin{\phi}

and maximize. Now from pure, unrelated experimentation, I also get \theta=\frac{90-\phi}{2} to maximize the distance.

Now my questions are

1) Is there anything wrong with my method? It's not a priority question but it would be useful
2) Is there a better way to do this? This solution is very messy and I was wondering if there was a more elegant, creative way to solve this. :)
3) Are both answers that I obtained above correct?

Thanks a lot

(I realize that another thread was made about this a year ago, but that never went anywhere, the problem was not solved, and the methods attempted was completely different, etc. so I thought it would be better simply to create a new topic. Merge if necessary: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=201484 )
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Anaxerzia ! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Anaxerzia said:
Pretend the ground is flat and that instead gravity is at an angle \phi-90), and that the ball is launch at angle \theta+\phi

What you are doing is using p and q coordinates (say), where p = x cosφ + y sinφ, q = y cosφ - x sinφ

Yes, that's a perfectly valid method! :smile:

(But "pretend the ground is flat" is not mathematical language! :wink:)
 
Or I guess you could have said to rotate by \phi , right? :-)

Does anyone have a more elegant solution? It seems to be lurking in there somewhere...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top