Slater Determinant & Permanent

  • Thread starter Thread starter M. next
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
How to use Slater determinant and permanent to find out whether the state is symmetrical or anti-symmetrical?
How to use them? I got the concept but I didn't get for example when to know if there was a plus or a minus and thus whether what we're talking about is a permanent or determinant (respectively).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have minus signs, its a determinant and totally antisymmetric, if you don't, it's a permanent and totally symmetric.

It's not something you determine. It is something you put into your ansatz: You choose determinants as a basis set for fermionic systems precisely because you know that you need an antisymmetric wave function, and determinants are the simplest kinds of wave functions which are totally antisymmetric. And for the same reason you choose permanents as basis for bosonic systems because they are the simplest wave functions which are totally symmetric.
 
Thank you a lot for clearing things up. I thought it is something to be determined.
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top