Sliding Block moving up incline

AI Thread Summary
A block with a mass of 5.0 kg slides down an incline at a constant velocity, indicating that friction must be balancing the gravitational force component acting down the slope. When projected back up the incline, the block's acceleration is influenced by both gravity and friction, leading to the equation for acceleration as 2g sin θ. The discussion also explores the conditions under which static friction equals the maximum value, emphasizing that static friction does not always equal μN. The angle at which a block begins to slide can be expressed as θ = tan^(-1)(μ_s), but this relationship is specific and not universally applicable to all scenarios involving friction and inclines. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving related physics problems effectively.
Zhalfirin88
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block with mass m = 5.0 kg slides down an inclined plane of slope angle 36.5o with a constant velocity. It is then projected up the same plane with an initial speed 1.05 m/s. How far up the incline will the block move before coming to rest?

The Attempt at a Solution



a_x = -g sin \theta

\Delta v^2 = 2a \Delta x

\frac{-v_o^2}{2a} = \Delta x

\frac{-1.05^2}{-2gsin \theta} = \Delta x

\frac{-1.05^2}{-11.658} = \Delta x

But this wasn't right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As it slides down it's moving at constant velocity. So what force must be acting on the block besides gravity?
 
I would say friction but there is no mention of it in the problem.
 
Zhalfirin88 said:
I would say friction but there is no mention of it in the problem.
Good. They expect you to conclude that on your own, based on the fact that it's not accelerating as it slides down.

So what must that friction force equal?
 
Doc Al said:
Good. They expect you to conclude that on your own, based on the fact that it's not accelerating as it slides down.

So what must that friction force equal?

I'm getting

f = -mg sin \theta
 
Zhalfirin88 said:
I'm getting

f = -mg sin \theta
Good. The magnitude is mgsinθ, but the direction depends on which way the block moves.
 
Doc Al said:
Good. The magnitude is mgsinθ, but the direction depends on which way the block moves.

I don't get how the friction helps any.
 
Zhalfirin88 said:
I don't get how the friction helps any.
To determine the acceleration, you need the net force. Friction is one of the forces acting on the block.
 
You'd only do that when the block is projected back up the incline right? Then use the kinematic equation I had in OP?

Edit: So I was thinking about this more. When the block is projected back up the incline, you'd have friction and gravity in the X direction. Since I found the magnitude of the friction above, the acceleration would be:

+mg sin \theta + mg sin \theta = ma_x masses would cancel, so:

2 g sin \theta = a_x

Does this look right so far? (I set the positive X direction going down the incline)

Edit 2: Yes, I was right, thanks Doc :P
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Zhalfirin88 said:
You'd only do that when the block is projected back up the incline right?
Friction acts whether the block is sliding up or down the incline. The problem you need to solve involves the block sliding up, so you need to find the block's acceleration as it slides up.
Then use the kinematic equation I had in OP?
Yes.
 
  • #11
Okay I have a new question that is similar to this.

A block is at rest on an inclined plane whose elevation can be varied. The coefficient of static friction is μs= 0.44, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is μk = 0.17. The angle of elevation θ is increased slowly from the horizontal. At what value of θ does the block begin to slide (in degrees)?

So I started out with:
Y-Direction
F_N - mg cos \theta = ma_y

F_N = mg cos \theta

X-Direction

-f + mg sin \theta = ma_x

-(\mu_s mg cos \theta) + mg sin \theta = ma_x

-\mu_s g cos \theta + g sin \theta = a_x

g(-\mu_s cos \theta + sin \theta) = a_x

But here is where I'm stuck and don't know what to do next.
 
  • #12
Two hints:
- What does ax equal?
- When does static friction = μN?
 
  • #13
Doc Al said:
- When does static friction = μN?

I don't understand what you're asking, when there's no sliding?

Doc Al said:
- What does ax equal?

Since you're giving this as a hint, I'm guessing you mean it's equal to zero. But I thought that since the block is moving (question asks for kinetic friction) you don't know if ax is zero or not.
 
  • #14
Zhalfirin88 said:
I don't understand what you're asking, when there's no sliding?
No, my point was that static friction does not always equal μN. μN represents the maximum value of static friction between two surfaces--the actual friction may well be less than that, depending on the situation. (For example: A book rests on a table. What's the static friction acting on it?)

Since you're giving this as a hint, I'm guessing you mean it's equal to zero.
Right.
But I thought that since the block is moving (question asks for kinetic friction) you don't know if ax is zero or not.
As the surface is tilted up, the acceleration remains zero until you get to the point where it just begins to start moving. That's the point you want, so it's only static friction that you care about. What's the maximum angle you can have and still not have the block slide? (Use the first hint, of course.)
 
  • #15
Yes, I knew that about static friction, however I think I'm stuck more mathematically, because if you simplify what I had up above when ax = 0 you get:
<br /> -\mu_s cos \theta + sin \theta = \frac{1}{g}<br /> What next?
 
  • #16
Zhalfirin88 said:
...if you simplify what I had up above when ax = 0 you get:
<br /> -\mu_s cos \theta + sin \theta = \frac{1}{g}<br />
That's not quite correct. Take another look.
 
  • #17
Oops. I still don't see how to solve for the angle.

<br /> <br /> -\mu_s cos \theta + sin \theta = 0<br /> <br />
 
  • #18
That's better. Play with it a bit. Move terms around.
 
  • #19
Just a question, is this going to end up being an identity, because I don't know those very well. It'd help if I knew there was an identity involved.
 
  • #20
No fancy trig identities involved. Hint: What trig function can be defined in terms of sine and cosine?
 
  • #21
Was in class. So:

\theta = tan^{-1} \mu_s

Now, is this always true? Like, if you're given a friction problem, and you need to find the angle, you can do this? Or vice versa, say you're given the angle and are asked to find the coefficient of static friction, you can immediately do this?
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Zhalfirin88 said:
Was in class. So:

\theta = tan^{-1} \mu_s
Right.

Now, is this always true? Like, if you're given a friction problem, and you need to find the angle, you can do this? Or vice versa, say you're given the angle and are asked to find the coefficient of static friction, you can immediately do this?
What you found is the angle at which something just starts to slip as a function of the coefficient of friction. That's a specific answer to a specific question. Don't go blindly using tanθ = μ, just because a problem has friction and an incline.

Note that equations work two ways. Given the angle at which slipping starts, you can find the coefficient of friction.
 
  • #23
Doc Al said:
What you found is the angle at which something just starts to slip as a function of the coefficient of friction. That's a specific answer to a specific question. Don't go blindly using tanθ = μ, just because a problem has friction and an incline.

Note that equations work two ways. Given the angle at which slipping starts, you can find the coefficient of friction.

Hm, I didn't say what I wanted to say. What I wanted to ask is, when a mass starts slipping down an incline, will this always work? Or, will it only work when the angle of the incline is being increased?
 
  • #24
Zhalfirin88 said:
What I wanted to ask is, when a mass starts slipping down an incline, will this always work? Or, will it only work when the angle of the incline is being increased?
If you mean anytime you have a mass starting to slip down an incline does tanθ = μ? No, not at all.
 
Back
Top