Will the cylinder slide or topple on an inclined plane?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics problem of determining whether a cylinder with a height of 70 cm and a diameter of 4 cm will slide or topple on a 30-degree inclined plane with a coefficient of friction equal to tan(30). The analysis reveals that the cylinder will topple rather than slide, as the calculated coefficient of friction (2/35) is significantly less than tan(30). The approach involves calculating torques and considering the center of gravity, leading to the conclusion that the cylinder's stability is compromised at the tipping point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and its calculation in physics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of center of gravity and stability
  • Knowledge of inclined planes and friction coefficients
  • Basic principles of dynamics and kinematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rotational dynamics and torque calculations
  • Learn about the stability of objects on inclined planes
  • Explore the effects of friction on motion and stability
  • Investigate the use of fictitious forces in non-inertial reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mechanics, particularly those studying dynamics and stability of rigid bodies on inclined surfaces.

BowlOfRed
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Greetings. I answer a lot of physics questions on another forum and I came across this one. So it's someone's homework problem, but not mine. :-) But as I looked at it, I realized that it's either very simple and I'm missing something, or it's more subtle and I don't have the tools to solve it. I'd appreciate knowing which. It really just intrigued me because it wasn't simple.

Homework Statement


A cylindrical shape with height 70cm and diameter 4cm is on a plane inclined at 30 degrees. The coefficient of friction is tan(30) (I'm assuming 30 degrees here). Will the shape slide or topple?

The Attempt at a Solution



I initially thought all I'd have to do was calculate the sum of torques about the front edge of the cylinder as it slides down. But then I realized that's insufficient because the front edge is accelerating (assuming it's sliding). Also, for a static cylinder, I'd just have a moment from the center of gravity, and I'd have a force from friction. But all the frictional force would be on the plane the same as the tipping point, so there would be no moment.

Next, although the cylinder is accelerating, I thought it's possible that it would be valid to use it as a frame of reference. In the no friction case, the cylinder will be experiencing an acceleration that is normal to the plane, so it's stable. As friction increases, the acceleration vector will shift to one side. Once it passes the tipping point, the shape will topple. In the cylinder frame of reference, the CG is 35cm up and 2cm from the edge, so the frictional acceleration can be no more than 2/35 of the normal acceleration. I could solve for the coefficient of friction that will be on the boundary.

acc(norm) = F(normal) / m
acc(norm) = m * g * cos(30) / m = g * cos(30)
acc(plane) = 2/35 * g * cos(30)
F(plane) = 2/35 * g * cos(30) * m = mu * m * g * cos30
2/35 * cos(30) = mu * cos(30)
2/35 = mu

Since that's much smaller than tan(30), it'll topple. But this doesn't feel right to me. So I figure I'm missing a bit. I well believe this method I took isn't valid, but thought I'd work through it just to see.

Thanks for helping me out!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi BowlOfRed! Welcome to PF! :wink:

BowlOfRed said:
I initially thought all I'd have to do was calculate the sum of torques about the front edge of the cylinder as it slides down. But then I realized that's insufficient because the front edge is accelerating (assuming it's sliding).

You can use the front edge for τ = dL/dt …

you can use any "comoving" point, ie any point whose velocity is parallel to the velocity of the centre of mass …

in particular for a body that isn't rotating, you can use any point on the body. :smile:

(don't forget that the angular momentum isn't Iω = 0, there's an extra v term)

Alternatively, treating it as a statics problem with a fictitious m dv/dt force parallel to the slope should give the same result. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K