Slipping Sphere on Steep Incline

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of a sphere on a steep incline where the frictional force exceeds the maximum static friction, preventing pure rolling. When the incline's angle is too steep, the sphere experiences oscillations between front spin and back spin due to the mismatch between translational and rotational accelerations. The frictional force acts to adjust the sphere's angular velocity to match its translational velocity, but this can lead to continuous slipping rather than stable rolling. Participants express confusion over the mechanics involved when slipping occurs and how friction influences motion in this scenario. Clarification on the relationship between translational and rotational dynamics on steep inclines is sought to better understand the slipping behavior.
dreamnoir
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to wrap my head around how a rolling and slipping sphere would be behave on an incline (with an angle of θ) that is too steep for pure rolling. I believe I understand the behaviour up to that point but once we reach the position where the amount of friction required to maintain rolling, F > μN, is surpassed my understand falls apart. It's at this point we'll no longer see pure rolling occur I'm having some trouble figuring out what happens exactly.

When we have a ball moving a flat surface and it's rotating too quickly (front spin), vR < ω, then we have a positive translational acceleration and negative rotational acceleration due to friction, or a > 0 and \alpha &lt; 0. When it's rotating too slowly (back spin), vR > ω, then we have a negative translation acceleration and positive rotational acceleration due to friction, a < 0 and \alpha &gt; 0. On a surface that the ball can roll on eventually vr = ω will become true and the ball will be rolling.

When we have a incline with too steep an angle and F > μN then we never get into pure rolling. However, I'm not sure what happens here. Since the rotational acceleration, \alpha = \frac{\mu NR}{I}, isn't linked to the translation acceleration, a = sinθg - μcosθg, we can end up up in the situation where \alpha &gt; aR so we end up with front spin after some time interval. This switches the condition of slipping and the friction direction reverses until we no longer have front spin and now it's back spin. This behaviour seems to oscillate back and forth forever.

I don't think this happens and something else is going on. It seems like friction would always oppose the relative direction of motion at the point of contact but if that's true I don't understand entirely how rolling with slipping down a steep incline works then. Some explanation would very helpful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When we have a incline with too steep an angle and F > μN then we never get into pure rolling. However, I'm not sure what happens here. Since the rotational acceleration, α=μNR I , isn't linked to the translation acceleration, a = sinθg - μcosθg, we can end up up in the situation where α>aR so we end up with front spin after some time interval. This switches the condition of slipping and the friction direction reverses until we no longer have front spin and now it's back spin. This behaviour seems to oscillate back and forth forever.

If α>aR then you are not into the slipping regime. The frictional force is able to supply enough angular acceleration to match the translational acceleration and you roll without slipping. Or, if you're already slipping, the roll rate is changing to match the translation rate.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top