Slope of the perpendicular line on the other line

Alg0r1thm
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Why is the slope of perpendicular line on the the other defined this way:
m = slope of a particular line
m'= slope of the perpendicular line on that particular line

m*m' = -1 OR m' = -1/m

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you have a line y=mx+c, and another line y'=m'x+c', what does m' have to be for y' to be perpendicular to y.
Draw a few lines and see.

i.e. if m=m', then the two lines are parallel.
 
Simon Bridge said:
If you have a line y=mx+c, and another line y'=m'x+c', what does m' have to be for y' to be perpendicular to y.
Draw a few lines and see.

i.e. if m=m', then the two lines are parallel.

You mean there is no kind of proof or something like algebraic statement which states that the perpendicular line slope would be concluded via it?
 
One way to look at it is this: if y= mx+ b is the equation of a line, then the slope, m, is the tangent of the angle, \theta, the line makes with the x-axis. If two lines are perpendicular then they form a right triangle with the x-axis as hypotenuse. The angle one of the lines makes with the x- axis, say \theta, will be acute, the other, \phi, will be obtuse.

Looking over this I see I have used the wrong words. I meant that one will be less that or equal to 45 degrees, the other larger than or equal to 45 degrees.

The angles inside that right triangle will be \theta and \pi- \phi and we must have \theta+ (\pi- \phi)= \pi/2 so that \phi- \theta= \pi/2.

Now use tan(a+ b)= \frac{tan(a)+ tan(b)}{1- tan(a)tan(b)} with a= \phi and b= -\theta:
tan(\phi- \theta)= \frac{tan(\phi)- tan(\theta)}{1+ tan(\phi)tan(\theta)}= tan\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)

But tan(\pi/2) is undefined! We must have the fraction on the left undefined which means the denominator must be 0: 1+ tan(\theta)tan(\phi)= 0 so that tan(\theta)tan(\phi)= -1 and that last is just "mm'= -1".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Alg0r1thm said:
You mean there is no kind of proof or something like algebraic statement which states that the perpendicular line slope would be concluded via it?
NO - I mean that you can start from what I wrote and work it out for yourself.
I was trying to set your feet on the right path.

HallsofIvy showed you one approach.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top