Slower rotation curves at centre

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Rotation
AI Thread Summary
Galaxy rotation curves typically show constant velocities for stars and gas as distance from the center increases, but a drop in velocity occurs towards the center. This phenomenon suggests that the central regions of galaxies may behave like a solid mass, contrary to Kepler’s third law, which predicts higher velocities closer to the center. The need for significant mass outside the visible disk, attributed to dark matter, helps explain the observed flat rotation curves. Additionally, as one approaches the center, the rotation velocity may increase again, indicating the presence of a massive black hole. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately modeling mass distribution in galaxies.
Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
On galaxy rotation curves, the velocities of stars (or gas) rotating about their galactic centre remain fairly constant as the distance from the galactic centre increases.

But these rotation curves show a drop in rotation velocity towards the centre of the galaxy.

http://astro.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkmatter/rotcurve.html"

I accept that at the centre the rotation velocity must be zero but just out from the centre, Kepler’s third law predicts that the velocities should be greatest and then fall off with increasing distance.

Does this velocity profile exist because the centre of galaxies up to about 6kpc (in the hyperlinked curve) are a bit like a solid mass?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Galactic rotation curves are determined by the distribution of mass throughout the galaxy.

Kepler's laws were derived empirically for the solar system where nearly all the mass is in the centre, in the Sun.

To obtain the typical galactic rotation curve, where for a large proportion of the radial distance the rotation velocity remains fairly constant, you need a lot of mass outside the visible galactic disk. This is one of the reasons it is believed galactic haloes contain a lot of Dark Matter.

As the radius approaches the centre you are leaving more and more mass outside that radius and the rotational velocity drops off, however often very near the centre it often starts to increase again indicating that there is often a large mass at the centre itself, most probably a massive Black Hole.

I hope this helps.

Garth
 
Hi Garth,

When the mass of a galaxy is worked out from the centre to a given radius r, the velocity of rotation is determined at that radius. Then using Kepler’s 3rd law, the inner mass can be determined. The outer mass (beyond the radius r) seems to be ignored.

Are you saying that near the centre of a galaxy where there is a higher density of mass that the above method is not valid?
 
Well, first it is the rotation velocity that is measured, using the slope of the red shift across the galactic disc as presented (projected) onto our celestial sphere.

Then the mass within that orbit can be calculated. If the outer mass is spherically distributed, symmetrically about the galactic centre the contributions from opposite sectors cancel themselves out and they can be ignored.

However, if they are not spherically distributed then they have to be taken into account, this is the case with real galaxies.

The actual Galaxy rotation curve is the data on which a model of the mass distribution has to be constructed.

Garth
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top