SM particles in highly curved spacetime

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
I'm curious as to whether parameters like rest mass and mixing angles, half-life for 2nd/3rd gen and other properties change for SM particles like muons in highly curved spacetimes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Local parameters, rest mass, half-life, etc. are the same. No matter how curved your spacetime is, there's a locally inertial frame of reference that looks like flat spacetime.

Anything that involves propagation, results in seriously screwy and complicated dynamics. You get pair production, red shift / blue shift, etc. There's even a basic theorem demonstrating that vacuum in one reference frame is no longer the vacuum in a different reference frame that's accelerated with respect to the first one (Unruh effect). Meaning that, if you have two observers passing through the same area of curved spacetime on different trajectories (e.g. one suspended above a gravitating object by constantly firing engines, and the other in free fall towards the object), one of them might see vacuum and the other might see a soup of particles.
 
Its also somewhat illdefined as well. One of the axioms of field theory is that the Fourier modes should asymptotically die off far from the source of the field disturbance/excitation. That way we have a sensible measure for free particles (the one thing we really understand well mathematically).

In curved spacetime, that is no longer necessarily the case. Sometimes you have modes that blow up, and sometimes even go into transplanckian regimes (where presumably quantum gravity plays a role) and we don't know how to deal with that. There might be backreactions onto the metric, and our approximation could break down.

So the whole subject of fields in curved spacetime is a sort of formal manipulation of quantities that kind of works so long as the metric doesn't get too curvy and the properties are nice enough that we can do something with it. One must keep in mind that it only works in certain regimes, and that its far from being rigorous mathematically (even for a physicist).

One of the upshots is (as Hamster points out) that particles lose their invariant meaning globally. Instead more formal operators and functions take center stage. It really requires a specialized textbook treatment to understand (and be warned, its complicated material).
 
HAelfix & hamter, thanks.

What about curved spacetimes that change rapidly as well?

Is there any way to match predictions with say cosmic rays near black holes or neutron stars or big bang nucelosynthesis?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
12K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top